"As far as extra dimensions are concerned, very tiny extra dimensions wouldn't be perceived in everyday life, just as atoms aren't: we see many atoms together but we don't see atoms individually"
About this Quote
Witten’s comparison is a masterclass in making an outrageously non-intuitive claim feel almost boring. Extra dimensions sound like science fiction because we instinctively treat “dimension” as a big, room-sized thing: a direction you could point to, a corridor you could walk down. He punctures that intuition by borrowing a mundane fact of modern life: you’ve never seen an atom, yet you live inside their collective behavior every second. The move is disarming on purpose. It reframes skepticism as a scale problem, not a credibility problem.
The intent isn’t to “prove” extra dimensions; it’s to make them psychologically habitable. By invoking atoms, Witten smuggles in an entire cultural memory: for centuries, atoms were philosophical speculation; now they’re the invisible bedrock of chemistry, electronics, medicine. The subtext is clear: today’s weirdness can be tomorrow’s infrastructure. If your standard for reality is direct perception, you’re already outmatched by the world you accept without complaint.
Contextually, this sits squarely inside string theory’s pitch: extra dimensions can be compactified, curled up so tightly that everyday energies can’t probe them. Witten’s analogy also doubles as a quiet defense of theory-driven physics. You don’t “see” an atom in the street; you infer it from consistent, testable consequences. He’s arguing that invisibility isn’t an objection, it’s a design constraint - and that mature science often begins where common sense stops being useful.
The intent isn’t to “prove” extra dimensions; it’s to make them psychologically habitable. By invoking atoms, Witten smuggles in an entire cultural memory: for centuries, atoms were philosophical speculation; now they’re the invisible bedrock of chemistry, electronics, medicine. The subtext is clear: today’s weirdness can be tomorrow’s infrastructure. If your standard for reality is direct perception, you’re already outmatched by the world you accept without complaint.
Contextually, this sits squarely inside string theory’s pitch: extra dimensions can be compactified, curled up so tightly that everyday energies can’t probe them. Witten’s analogy also doubles as a quiet defense of theory-driven physics. You don’t “see” an atom in the street; you infer it from consistent, testable consequences. He’s arguing that invisibility isn’t an objection, it’s a design constraint - and that mature science often begins where common sense stops being useful.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Edward
Add to List




