"As far as I can judge, not much good can be done without disturbing something or somebody"
About this Quote
Reform rarely arrives like a polite memo; it arrives like a knock that rattles the doorframe. Edward Blake's line is candid about the dirty secret of politics: "good" is not a neutral substance you can add to society without displacing something already there. By treating disturbance as a precondition rather than a regrettable side effect, he rejects the comforting fantasy that progress can be painless if only leaders are sufficiently tactful.
The phrase "As far as I can judge" is doing quiet work. It's a statesman's hedge that reads like humility but functions as armor: he's not claiming a moral absolute, he's claiming hard-earned experience. That framing lets him speak bluntly without sounding doctrinaire. Then comes the sting: "disturbing something or somebody". Not "some policy" or "some interest" - a reminder that every political improvement has a human face on the receiving end, someone whose routine, status, or profit gets disrupted.
Blake's era - late-19th-century Canada, with its battles over Confederation's growing pains, provincial rights, patronage, religious schooling, and the politics of language and identity - was built on contested compromises. In that landscape, "good" meant structural change: redistributing power between Ottawa and the provinces, redrawing rules for who counts and who decides. The subtext is a warning aimed at both the timid reformer and the sanctimonious critic: if your program offends no one, it probably isn't a program. Disturbance isn't virtue, but Blake insists it's the admission fee for consequential governance.
The phrase "As far as I can judge" is doing quiet work. It's a statesman's hedge that reads like humility but functions as armor: he's not claiming a moral absolute, he's claiming hard-earned experience. That framing lets him speak bluntly without sounding doctrinaire. Then comes the sting: "disturbing something or somebody". Not "some policy" or "some interest" - a reminder that every political improvement has a human face on the receiving end, someone whose routine, status, or profit gets disrupted.
Blake's era - late-19th-century Canada, with its battles over Confederation's growing pains, provincial rights, patronage, religious schooling, and the politics of language and identity - was built on contested compromises. In that landscape, "good" meant structural change: redistributing power between Ottawa and the provinces, redrawing rules for who counts and who decides. The subtext is a warning aimed at both the timid reformer and the sanctimonious critic: if your program offends no one, it probably isn't a program. Disturbance isn't virtue, but Blake insists it's the admission fee for consequential governance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Edward
Add to List









