"As for the expected boon to the Mexican economy, we have seen none of these gains, and instead we have seen NAFTA's detrimental impact on the Mexican workers"
About this Quote
“As for the expected boon” is a politician’s way of putting a promise on trial. Lynch frames NAFTA not as an abstract trade pact but as a failed prophecy: benefits were forecast, scrutinized, and found missing. The phrase “we have seen” does double duty. It signals evidence and accountability, while quietly asserting authority over whose evidence counts. In Washington, that’s a power move: if “we” didn’t see the gains, they might as well not exist.
The subtext is a rebuke of technocratic optimism. NAFTA was sold in the 1990s with tidy models and big aggregate numbers; Lynch zooms in on distribution. “Mexican economy” versus “Mexican workers” isn’t a slip, it’s the argument. Economies can “grow” while labor gets squeezed by wage competition, disrupted agriculture, or uneven industrial development along the border. By juxtaposing the national with the human, he implies that the real metric of a deal is who bears the costs.
Context matters: this is also an American lawmaker staking out a moral critique that conveniently aligns with domestic political pressure. Pointing to harm abroad can function as an indirect defense of labor at home, without sounding purely protectionist. It’s a careful rhetorical pivot: condemn NAFTA’s winners as invisible, elevate its losers as undeniable, and make “trade reform” feel like basic decency rather than partisan repositioning.
The subtext is a rebuke of technocratic optimism. NAFTA was sold in the 1990s with tidy models and big aggregate numbers; Lynch zooms in on distribution. “Mexican economy” versus “Mexican workers” isn’t a slip, it’s the argument. Economies can “grow” while labor gets squeezed by wage competition, disrupted agriculture, or uneven industrial development along the border. By juxtaposing the national with the human, he implies that the real metric of a deal is who bears the costs.
Context matters: this is also an American lawmaker staking out a moral critique that conveniently aligns with domestic political pressure. Pointing to harm abroad can function as an indirect defense of labor at home, without sounding purely protectionist. It’s a careful rhetorical pivot: condemn NAFTA’s winners as invisible, elevate its losers as undeniable, and make “trade reform” feel like basic decency rather than partisan repositioning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List
