"As has been pointed out with Libya, the debate over Libya, sometimes we allow diplomatic relations with imperfect regimes because progress can best be made through engagement instead of isolation"
About this Quote
Engagement is the respectable word politicians use when they want to admit the world is messier than campaign rhetoric. Blumenauer’s line is built to justify compromise without ever sounding compromised: “imperfect regimes” is a clean euphemism that politely sidesteps the uglier nouns (dictatorship, repression, blood). The key move is the phrase “as has been pointed out,” a little shield of borrowed authority that implies a consensus already exists. If you’re still debating, you’re late.
The Libya reference matters because it invokes a specific post-9/11 playbook: after Qaddafi’s turn toward the West in the early 2000s, engagement was sold as a pragmatic success story - sanctions eased, weapons programs curtailed, diplomacy “worked.” By tapping that memory, Blumenauer isn’t relitigating Libya so much as recruiting it as an exhibit in a larger argument: isolation is emotionally satisfying, but often strategically sterile.
Subtextually, the quote is a rebuttal to moral absolutism - the kind that demands total purity in foreign policy and treats contact as contamination. “Sometimes we allow” is doing heavy lifting, framing engagement as a reluctant exception rather than a comfortable habit. It reassures skeptical listeners that the speaker hasn’t gone soft; he’s simply choosing the tool that might actually move the dial.
The intent, then, is not to praise bad actors but to defend the uncomfortable middle ground where American power most often operates: talking to regimes we dislike because the alternative is talking only to ourselves.
The Libya reference matters because it invokes a specific post-9/11 playbook: after Qaddafi’s turn toward the West in the early 2000s, engagement was sold as a pragmatic success story - sanctions eased, weapons programs curtailed, diplomacy “worked.” By tapping that memory, Blumenauer isn’t relitigating Libya so much as recruiting it as an exhibit in a larger argument: isolation is emotionally satisfying, but often strategically sterile.
Subtextually, the quote is a rebuttal to moral absolutism - the kind that demands total purity in foreign policy and treats contact as contamination. “Sometimes we allow” is doing heavy lifting, framing engagement as a reluctant exception rather than a comfortable habit. It reassures skeptical listeners that the speaker hasn’t gone soft; he’s simply choosing the tool that might actually move the dial.
The intent, then, is not to praise bad actors but to defend the uncomfortable middle ground where American power most often operates: talking to regimes we dislike because the alternative is talking only to ourselves.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Earl
Add to List
