"As soon as questions of will or decision or reason or choice of action arise, human science is at a loss"
About this Quote
Chomsky’s line lands like a cold diagnosis: the closer you get to the part of human life that feels most “human” - choosing, deciding, acting for reasons - the more our scientific confidence starts to stutter. It’s a deliberately deflating move, aimed at a culture that treats “science” as a universal solvent, capable of dissolving every mystery from appetite to ethics. He’s not dunking on science so much as puncturing a category error: methods built to model measurable regularities don’t automatically scale to the interior drama of deliberation.
The subtext is a warning about overreach, especially in the behavioral sciences and in any politics that borrows their authority. If human action can be reduced to prediction and control, then persuasion quietly becomes engineering, and freedom becomes a folk story we tell ourselves while institutions optimize us. Chomsky’s activist edge matters here: he’s spent decades critiquing how “expert” language can naturalize power, treating policy choices as technical necessities rather than contestable moral decisions.
Contextually, this fits Chomsky’s long-running skepticism toward claims that we already possess a full, computational account of mind and agency. He’s open to rigorous inquiry, but allergic to premature triumphalism. The sentence is constructed to force humility: “as soon as” signals a threshold we cross quickly, and “at a loss” admits not just missing data but missing tools. The rhetorical power is its refusal to flatter either side - it doesn’t romanticize free will, it just notes where the explanatory machinery starts to grind.
The subtext is a warning about overreach, especially in the behavioral sciences and in any politics that borrows their authority. If human action can be reduced to prediction and control, then persuasion quietly becomes engineering, and freedom becomes a folk story we tell ourselves while institutions optimize us. Chomsky’s activist edge matters here: he’s spent decades critiquing how “expert” language can naturalize power, treating policy choices as technical necessities rather than contestable moral decisions.
Contextually, this fits Chomsky’s long-running skepticism toward claims that we already possess a full, computational account of mind and agency. He’s open to rigorous inquiry, but allergic to premature triumphalism. The sentence is constructed to force humility: “as soon as” signals a threshold we cross quickly, and “at a loss” admits not just missing data but missing tools. The rhetorical power is its refusal to flatter either side - it doesn’t romanticize free will, it just notes where the explanatory machinery starts to grind.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|
More Quotes by Noam
Add to List





