"As to the war, while it is always thought rash to have any strong military convictions, I have always believed that if they would go straight to Sebastopol early in the season they would take it with little difficulty"
About this Quote
Newman slips a stiletto into Victorian decorum: the opening caveat that it is "always thought rash to have any strong military convictions" reads like a polite bow before he starts throwing punches. He knows the social code of his moment - the Crimean War era, when armchair strategy was both irresistible and disreputable - and he exploits it. The line is built to sound modest, even sheepish, while actually asserting the kind of confidence that gets people killed.
The subtext is impatience with half-measures and bureaucratic drift. "Go straight to Sebastopol" is less a tactical note than a diagnosis: the war effort is being managed by committees, traditions, and reputations rather than clarity of purpose. "Early in the season" carries the grim realism the public prefers not to hear; timing, weather, supply, and disease decide outcomes as much as heroism does. Newman makes it sound obvious, which is the point. If it is so obvious, why wasn't it done? That question indicts leadership without naming names.
His specific intent is to puncture the mystique of military expertise. By presenting a clean, direct solution - seize the decisive objective quickly - he implies that the establishment's caution is not wisdom but self-protective dithering. The phrase "with little difficulty" is the most acidic part: it minimizes the enemy to maximize the scandal of delay. Newman isn't merely predicting victory; he's exposing how nations talk themselves into prolonged suffering when simple decisiveness would have forced accountability early.
The subtext is impatience with half-measures and bureaucratic drift. "Go straight to Sebastopol" is less a tactical note than a diagnosis: the war effort is being managed by committees, traditions, and reputations rather than clarity of purpose. "Early in the season" carries the grim realism the public prefers not to hear; timing, weather, supply, and disease decide outcomes as much as heroism does. Newman makes it sound obvious, which is the point. If it is so obvious, why wasn't it done? That question indicts leadership without naming names.
His specific intent is to puncture the mystique of military expertise. By presenting a clean, direct solution - seize the decisive objective quickly - he implies that the establishment's caution is not wisdom but self-protective dithering. The phrase "with little difficulty" is the most acidic part: it minimizes the enemy to maximize the scandal of delay. Newman isn't merely predicting victory; he's exposing how nations talk themselves into prolonged suffering when simple decisiveness would have forced accountability early.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Francis
Add to List





