"As we continue to make great progress in the war on terror, now more than ever, it is important that members of the international community stand-by and bolster the efforts of the emerging diplomatic leaders in Iraq and Afghanistan"
About this Quote
“Stand-by and bolster” is the tell: a phrase that wants the moral credit of solidarity without the inconvenience of commitment. Inhofe’s line, delivered in the post-9/11 political weather where “war on terror” functioned less as a strategy than as a permission slip, performs a careful rhetorical two-step. First, it declares “great progress” as a premise rather than a claim to be proven, laundering uncertainty into momentum. Then it pivots to “now more than ever,” the classic urgency lever that forecloses debate by implying hesitation is negligence.
The subtext is coalition management under strain. By the time Iraq and Afghanistan were being framed as incubators for “emerging diplomatic leaders,” the U.S. needed international buy-in not just for legitimacy but for burden-sharing: troops, money, reconstruction contracts, intelligence cooperation. “International community” sounds inclusive and consensual, but it’s also a soft summons to allies who had grown skeptical of the missions’ shifting rationales and mounting costs.
Calling Iraqi and Afghan figures “emerging diplomatic leaders” is strategic flattery with a prophylactic purpose. It suggests local agency and democratic maturation, which helps repackage an occupation and counterinsurgency into a story about mentorship and institution-building. The line aims to keep the narrative upright: progress is happening, the right people are rising, the world must help - and anyone who questions that arc risks being painted as undermining fragile “diplomacy.” In that sense, the sentence is less a report from the field than a maintenance memo for the home front.
The subtext is coalition management under strain. By the time Iraq and Afghanistan were being framed as incubators for “emerging diplomatic leaders,” the U.S. needed international buy-in not just for legitimacy but for burden-sharing: troops, money, reconstruction contracts, intelligence cooperation. “International community” sounds inclusive and consensual, but it’s also a soft summons to allies who had grown skeptical of the missions’ shifting rationales and mounting costs.
Calling Iraqi and Afghan figures “emerging diplomatic leaders” is strategic flattery with a prophylactic purpose. It suggests local agency and democratic maturation, which helps repackage an occupation and counterinsurgency into a story about mentorship and institution-building. The line aims to keep the narrative upright: progress is happening, the right people are rising, the world must help - and anyone who questions that arc risks being painted as undermining fragile “diplomacy.” In that sense, the sentence is less a report from the field than a maintenance memo for the home front.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
