"As we move towards 8 or 10 billion people on the planet, there's a little less gold per capita. Each one of us will continue to be fighting over an ever smaller percentage of total resources. This is not a happy thought"
About this Quote
Kamen’s line lands like an engineer’s cold printout: the math is simple, the implications aren’t. By choosing “gold” first, he’s not really talking about jewelry or bullion; he’s using a universally legible stand-in for anything scarce that people treat as valuable: energy, water, land, attention from institutions, even stability. “Per capita” is the tell. This is the language of systems, not sermons, and it quietly shifts the listener from moral debate to arithmetic inevitability.
The subtext is a critique of the default story modern societies tell themselves: that growth solves growth. More people, more markets, more innovation, more wealth. Kamen punctures that optimism with a zero-sentiment premise: finite resources divided by expanding demand produces competition, and competition tends to escalate. “Fighting” is intentionally blunt, collapsing everything from geopolitical conflict to everyday price spikes into one verb. It frames scarcity not as a distant environmental abstraction but as a social accelerant.
Contextually, this fits an inventor whose brand is problem-solving at scale. Kamen isn’t indulging in apocalypse; he’s setting up the case for redesign. The closing understatement - “not a happy thought” - is doing rhetorical work. It’s a pressure valve that keeps the quote from sounding like a scold, while still leaving a residue of discomfort. He’s betting that unease is productive: if the denominator is rising, you either expand the numerator through new technology and better distribution, or you accept that politics will become a permanent contest over shrinking shares.
The subtext is a critique of the default story modern societies tell themselves: that growth solves growth. More people, more markets, more innovation, more wealth. Kamen punctures that optimism with a zero-sentiment premise: finite resources divided by expanding demand produces competition, and competition tends to escalate. “Fighting” is intentionally blunt, collapsing everything from geopolitical conflict to everyday price spikes into one verb. It frames scarcity not as a distant environmental abstraction but as a social accelerant.
Contextually, this fits an inventor whose brand is problem-solving at scale. Kamen isn’t indulging in apocalypse; he’s setting up the case for redesign. The closing understatement - “not a happy thought” - is doing rhetorical work. It’s a pressure valve that keeps the quote from sounding like a scold, while still leaving a residue of discomfort. He’s betting that unease is productive: if the denominator is rising, you either expand the numerator through new technology and better distribution, or you accept that politics will become a permanent contest over shrinking shares.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Dean
Add to List



