"As we talk about the need to foster academic achievement, we must recognize and reward those who strive academically, just as we honor athletic champions. Meeting the President of the United States is just the honor we should bestow on our academic champions"
About this Quote
America loves a scoreboard, and Brad Sherman is trying to rig one for the classroom. The line works because it borrows the emotional machinery of sports culture - glory, public recognition, proximity to power - and redirects it toward grades and intellectual labor. By pairing "academic achievement" with "athletic champions", Sherman isn’t merely praising studying; he’s diagnosing a status hierarchy where brains are supposed to matter but often don’t get the same ceremonial payoff.
The specific intent is policy-adjacent persuasion: normalize the idea that academic excellence deserves institutional pageantry, then propose the highest available symbol of national validation: meeting the President. That’s not a small perk; it’s a civics-flavored red carpet. Sherman understands that in a media-driven culture, honor is a currency, and the state can mint it cheaply. A presidential handshake costs little and signals that the nation is paying attention.
The subtext is also disciplinary. Reward structures shape behavior. If teenagers see that the path to applause isn’t only through touchdowns and trophies, schools can nudge ambition toward AP classes, science fairs, debate tournaments. At the same time, the quote quietly flatters the presidency as the ultimate arbiter of merit - a useful move for a politician who benefits from civic reverence and from aligning himself with "achievement" as an American value.
Context matters: late-20th/early-21st century anxiety about competitiveness, STEM pipelines, and whether U.S. schools reward the right kind of excellence. Sherman’s proposal is symbolic politics, but symbols are part of the infrastructure of motivation.
The specific intent is policy-adjacent persuasion: normalize the idea that academic excellence deserves institutional pageantry, then propose the highest available symbol of national validation: meeting the President. That’s not a small perk; it’s a civics-flavored red carpet. Sherman understands that in a media-driven culture, honor is a currency, and the state can mint it cheaply. A presidential handshake costs little and signals that the nation is paying attention.
The subtext is also disciplinary. Reward structures shape behavior. If teenagers see that the path to applause isn’t only through touchdowns and trophies, schools can nudge ambition toward AP classes, science fairs, debate tournaments. At the same time, the quote quietly flatters the presidency as the ultimate arbiter of merit - a useful move for a politician who benefits from civic reverence and from aligning himself with "achievement" as an American value.
Context matters: late-20th/early-21st century anxiety about competitiveness, STEM pipelines, and whether U.S. schools reward the right kind of excellence. Sherman’s proposal is symbolic politics, but symbols are part of the infrastructure of motivation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Study Motivation |
|---|
More Quotes by Brad
Add to List



