"As you know, in this country Anglo-Americans are about 75 to 76 percent home ownership in this country, where Hispanics, African Americans are less than 50 percent"
About this Quote
A statistic can be a scalpel or a smoke bomb; Alphonso Jackson wields it like both. On paper, he is naming a structural gap in homeownership. In practice, the phrasing quietly naturalizes a hierarchy: “Anglo-Americans” lead, “Hispanics, African Americans” trail. The numbers sound clinical, but the sentence has a social order baked into its grammar, with whiteness positioned as the baseline and everyone else rendered as deviation.
The setup, “As you know,” matters. It’s a rhetorical nudge that tries to turn a contested reality into common sense. If you “know” it, you’re less likely to interrogate why it’s true: redlining’s long shadow, discriminatory lending, wage disparities, credit scoring biases, unequal inheritances. Jackson’s line gestures at disparity while sidestepping its causes, a move that often functions in policy talk as pre-emptive insulation. You can acknowledge the gap without conceding culpability.
Context does the rest. As a public servant tied to housing policy, Jackson isn’t speaking into a vacuum; he’s speaking into debates about the state’s role in expanding access to mortgages and the political anxieties around who gets help, and on what terms. The quote’s intent reads as agenda-setting: define the problem in a way that makes certain solutions feel “reasonable” (market access, ownership initiatives) while keeping thornier explanations (systemic discrimination, wealth extraction) at arm’s length.
It’s effective because it sounds like neutral measurement. It isn’t. It’s framing: disparity as a fact to manage, not a history to confront.
The setup, “As you know,” matters. It’s a rhetorical nudge that tries to turn a contested reality into common sense. If you “know” it, you’re less likely to interrogate why it’s true: redlining’s long shadow, discriminatory lending, wage disparities, credit scoring biases, unequal inheritances. Jackson’s line gestures at disparity while sidestepping its causes, a move that often functions in policy talk as pre-emptive insulation. You can acknowledge the gap without conceding culpability.
Context does the rest. As a public servant tied to housing policy, Jackson isn’t speaking into a vacuum; he’s speaking into debates about the state’s role in expanding access to mortgages and the political anxieties around who gets help, and on what terms. The quote’s intent reads as agenda-setting: define the problem in a way that makes certain solutions feel “reasonable” (market access, ownership initiatives) while keeping thornier explanations (systemic discrimination, wealth extraction) at arm’s length.
It’s effective because it sounds like neutral measurement. It isn’t. It’s framing: disparity as a fact to manage, not a history to confront.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Alphonso
Add to List
