"Astronomers ought to be able to ask fundamental questions without accelerators"
About this Quote
The subtext is partly methodological, partly cultural. High-energy physics has trained the public to associate "fundamental" with "bigger accelerator", as if reality yields only to maximal engineering. Perlmutter pushes back on that hierarchy. Astronomy, he implies, should not have to rent legitimacy from particle physics. If dark energy, dark matter, or the shape of spacetime are fundamental, then the cosmos itself is the experiment already running, scattering clues across supernovae, galaxy surveys, and the cosmic microwave background.
Context matters here: late-20th- and early-21st-century physics has been defined by mega-projects, long timelines, and the increasing difficulty of direct tests. Perlmutter's quote speaks to a field trying to stay empirical when energies are unreachable on Earth. It's also a subtle plea for intellectual pluralism: fund the tools that let questions stay basic, not just the ones that make answers expensive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Perlmutter, Saul. (2026, January 17). Astronomers ought to be able to ask fundamental questions without accelerators. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/astronomers-ought-to-be-able-to-ask-fundamental-63159/
Chicago Style
Perlmutter, Saul. "Astronomers ought to be able to ask fundamental questions without accelerators." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/astronomers-ought-to-be-able-to-ask-fundamental-63159/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Astronomers ought to be able to ask fundamental questions without accelerators." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/astronomers-ought-to-be-able-to-ask-fundamental-63159/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.




