"At a time when we are dealing with unpredictable suppliers of energy abroad and higher gas costs at home, the decision to increase domestic energy exploration is integral to a balanced, common sense energy policy"
About this Quote
The line is engineered to make drilling sound less like an ideological choice and more like basic household prudence. Neugebauer frames the moment as a squeeze play: “unpredictable suppliers of energy abroad” on one side, “higher gas costs at home” on the other. That pairing turns a sprawling, messy global energy system into a simple pressure narrative with an obvious release valve: “increase domestic energy exploration.”
The intent is political triage. By foregrounding volatility overseas, he taps a post-1970s American reflex that equates foreign energy dependence with vulnerability, then bridges it to a pocketbook pain voters feel immediately at the pump. The phrase “balanced, common sense energy policy” is the rhetorical masterstroke: it pre-baptizes the proposal as moderate and pragmatic, implying that opponents are either naïve about geopolitics or indifferent to working families.
Subtext: “exploration” is a softer word than “drilling,” and it sidesteps the environmental tradeoffs that usually dominate the debate. The quote treats domestic production as a direct lever on gas prices, even though prices are set in global markets and can be only loosely responsive in the short term. That slippage is the point; the argument is less about technical causality than about moral positioning - doing something, here, now, against forces “abroad.”
Contextually, this is the language of the early-2000s-to-2010s energy wars, when “energy independence” became a bipartisan slogan and “drill more” was sold as both national security and consumer relief. It’s policy as branding: cast extraction as sanity, and the controversy as needless drama.
The intent is political triage. By foregrounding volatility overseas, he taps a post-1970s American reflex that equates foreign energy dependence with vulnerability, then bridges it to a pocketbook pain voters feel immediately at the pump. The phrase “balanced, common sense energy policy” is the rhetorical masterstroke: it pre-baptizes the proposal as moderate and pragmatic, implying that opponents are either naïve about geopolitics or indifferent to working families.
Subtext: “exploration” is a softer word than “drilling,” and it sidesteps the environmental tradeoffs that usually dominate the debate. The quote treats domestic production as a direct lever on gas prices, even though prices are set in global markets and can be only loosely responsive in the short term. That slippage is the point; the argument is less about technical causality than about moral positioning - doing something, here, now, against forces “abroad.”
Contextually, this is the language of the early-2000s-to-2010s energy wars, when “energy independence” became a bipartisan slogan and “drill more” was sold as both national security and consumer relief. It’s policy as branding: cast extraction as sanity, and the controversy as needless drama.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Randy
Add to List
