"At that time, I had recently finished a book called Amazing Grace, which many people tell me is a very painful book to read. Well, if it was painful to read, it was also painful to write. I had pains in my chest for two years while I was writing that book"
About this Quote
Kozol’s line lands with the blunt force of a body refusing to let politics stay abstract. He’s talking about Amazing Grace, his chronicle of children and families living inside the engineered scarcity of the South Bronx, and he starts by acknowledging readers’ discomfort only to refuse the comforting myth that empathy is cost-free. If you flinched, he implies, good. But don’t confuse your momentary pain with the sustained injury he had to witness, document, and translate into sentences that won’t let you look away.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke of the tasteful distance that often surrounds writing on poverty. Kozol isn’t selling trauma; he’s testifying to what prolonged proximity to structural cruelty does to the observer who is paying attention. “Painful to write” isn’t a writerly boast about craft; it’s an ethical claim. He frames authorship as exposure: to grief, to rage, to complicity, to the fear that language will inevitably aestheticize what should indict.
The chest pains do double duty. They read as literal stress, but they also function rhetorically as proof of sincerity in a culture that treats outrage as performative and compassion as a brand. By putting his own body on the record, Kozol makes the suffering he describes harder to dismiss as “sad but inevitable.” He’s arguing, without sermonizing, that a society able to tolerate children’s deprivation is already sick, and the act of witnessing that sickness should hurt. If it doesn’t, the reader’s comfort is the real pathology.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke of the tasteful distance that often surrounds writing on poverty. Kozol isn’t selling trauma; he’s testifying to what prolonged proximity to structural cruelty does to the observer who is paying attention. “Painful to write” isn’t a writerly boast about craft; it’s an ethical claim. He frames authorship as exposure: to grief, to rage, to complicity, to the fear that language will inevitably aestheticize what should indict.
The chest pains do double duty. They read as literal stress, but they also function rhetorically as proof of sincerity in a culture that treats outrage as performative and compassion as a brand. By putting his own body on the record, Kozol makes the suffering he describes harder to dismiss as “sad but inevitable.” He’s arguing, without sermonizing, that a society able to tolerate children’s deprivation is already sick, and the act of witnessing that sickness should hurt. If it doesn’t, the reader’s comfort is the real pathology.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List
