"At the same time, I think books create a sort of network in the reader's mind, with one book reinforcing another. Some books form relationships. Other books stand in opposition. No two writers or readers have the same pattern of interaction"
About this Quote
Reading, for Margaret Mahy, isn’t a quiet, solitary pastime; it’s an act of mental architecture. Her image of books as a “network” in the reader’s mind reframes literature as something closer to an ecosystem than a shelf: texts don’t simply sit there, self-contained, but cross-pollinate, argue, echo, and mutate as they’re remembered alongside each other. The intent is gently radical. She’s pushing back on the idea that meaning is delivered intact from writer to reader, like a parcel. Meaning, in her model, is produced in the wiring.
The subtext is a defense of rereading and of “mixed” reading lives. A children’s novel can sharpen the emotional stakes of a “serious” book; a nonfiction argument can make a fantasy world feel newly political. When Mahy says books “form relationships” or “stand in opposition,” she’s describing the reader’s private canon as a dynamic conversation: admiration, rivalry, correction, and even betrayal. That’s why the line lands. It grants the reader agency without turning the author into a mere content provider.
Context matters too: Mahy wrote across genres and age categories, often resisting the cultural impulse to segregate children’s literature from the literary mainstream. Her point quietly undercuts gatekeeping. If “no two writers or readers have the same pattern of interaction,” there’s no single approved route through culture, no definitive map of what you’re “supposed” to take from a book. There’s only the network you build, and the person you become inside it.
The subtext is a defense of rereading and of “mixed” reading lives. A children’s novel can sharpen the emotional stakes of a “serious” book; a nonfiction argument can make a fantasy world feel newly political. When Mahy says books “form relationships” or “stand in opposition,” she’s describing the reader’s private canon as a dynamic conversation: admiration, rivalry, correction, and even betrayal. That’s why the line lands. It grants the reader agency without turning the author into a mere content provider.
Context matters too: Mahy wrote across genres and age categories, often resisting the cultural impulse to segregate children’s literature from the literary mainstream. Her point quietly undercuts gatekeeping. If “no two writers or readers have the same pattern of interaction,” there’s no single approved route through culture, no definitive map of what you’re “supposed” to take from a book. There’s only the network you build, and the person you become inside it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Book |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Margaret
Add to List



