"At the same time, new concepts and abstractions flow into the picture, taking up the task of describing the universe without reference to such time or space - abstractions for which our language lacks adequate terms"
About this Quote
Whorf is pointing at a quiet but radical moment in modern science: the point where reality stops cooperating with the furniture of everyday thought. “At the same time” signals a historical hinge. Physics and cosmology are still using familiar scaffolding (time, space, “picture”), yet new theories are already smuggling in entities and relations that don’t fit the old frame. The phrase “flow into the picture” is almost comic in its restraint; these abstractions don’t politely enter, they flood the room and force a remodel.
The intent isn’t mystical. It’s methodological. Whorf is warning that our descriptive tools are not neutral: we inherit a language built for mid-sized human life, then try to aim it at quantum fields, curved spacetime, or statistical realities that refuse common-sense intuitions. His subtext is a critique of complacency. If your vocabulary presumes time and space as givens, you will keep “finding” them, even when the best models are trying to do without them.
Context matters: Whorf’s broader project, often summarized as linguistic relativity, argued that language influences habitual thought. Here, he’s essentially diagnosing a translation crisis inside science itself. The universe is being re-described in terms that are mathematically precise but linguistically impoverished, which creates a gap between what we can calculate and what we can comfortably imagine. That gap isn’t just a communication problem; it shapes which ideas feel thinkable, teachable, and therefore legitimate. Whorf is betting that conceptual revolutions don’t only require better equations. They require new ways of saying.
The intent isn’t mystical. It’s methodological. Whorf is warning that our descriptive tools are not neutral: we inherit a language built for mid-sized human life, then try to aim it at quantum fields, curved spacetime, or statistical realities that refuse common-sense intuitions. His subtext is a critique of complacency. If your vocabulary presumes time and space as givens, you will keep “finding” them, even when the best models are trying to do without them.
Context matters: Whorf’s broader project, often summarized as linguistic relativity, argued that language influences habitual thought. Here, he’s essentially diagnosing a translation crisis inside science itself. The universe is being re-described in terms that are mathematically precise but linguistically impoverished, which creates a gap between what we can calculate and what we can comfortably imagine. That gap isn’t just a communication problem; it shapes which ideas feel thinkable, teachable, and therefore legitimate. Whorf is betting that conceptual revolutions don’t only require better equations. They require new ways of saying.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Benjamin
Add to List



