"At times we expected the allies unquestioningly to follow our leads; sometimes we failed to consult them in advance before reversing policies; at other times we ignored their requests"
About this Quote
Confession masquerading as management-speak: that is the diplomatic trick here. Kerry’s sentence is built like a tidy internal memo, but it smuggles in an indictment of superpower entitlement. The repeated “at times...sometimes...at other times” reads like a prosecutor laying out counts, except the defendant and the prosecutor are the same person. It’s a controlled burn of culpability - specific enough to sound honest, diffuse enough to avoid naming the most explosive episodes.
The intent is damage assessment, not self-flagellation. By choosing verbs like “expected,” “failed,” and “ignored,” Kerry maps a spectrum from assumption to negligence to outright dismissal. “Unquestioningly” is the tell: it doesn’t just criticize tactical mistakes, it exposes the emotional expectation beneath them - that allies exist to ratify decisions already made. The subtext is that alliances are not only about shared interests; they’re about process, respect, and the basic politics of being consulted before you’re conscripted into someone else’s strategy.
Contextually, this belongs to the long arc of postwar U.S.-led coalition management, where power imbalances tempt the lead partner to treat coordination as a courtesy rather than a requirement. The line about “reversing policies” hints at whiplash: allies asked to sell a joint position at home, then left to explain sudden pivots they had no hand in shaping. It’s also a warning to future policymakers. The cost of unilateralism isn’t just resentment; it’s weakened legitimacy, slower cooperation, and allies who start hedging because they’ve learned the lead can change the map without telling the people holding the compass.
The intent is damage assessment, not self-flagellation. By choosing verbs like “expected,” “failed,” and “ignored,” Kerry maps a spectrum from assumption to negligence to outright dismissal. “Unquestioningly” is the tell: it doesn’t just criticize tactical mistakes, it exposes the emotional expectation beneath them - that allies exist to ratify decisions already made. The subtext is that alliances are not only about shared interests; they’re about process, respect, and the basic politics of being consulted before you’re conscripted into someone else’s strategy.
Contextually, this belongs to the long arc of postwar U.S.-led coalition management, where power imbalances tempt the lead partner to treat coordination as a courtesy rather than a requirement. The line about “reversing policies” hints at whiplash: allies asked to sell a joint position at home, then left to explain sudden pivots they had no hand in shaping. It’s also a warning to future policymakers. The cost of unilateralism isn’t just resentment; it’s weakened legitimacy, slower cooperation, and allies who start hedging because they’ve learned the lead can change the map without telling the people holding the compass.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List





