"Avoid any specific discussion of public policy at public meetings"
About this Quote
Politics, Cicero implies, is best won in the vague. “Avoid any specific discussion of public policy at public meetings” reads like a tactical memo from someone who’s seen how specificity turns into liability the moment it hits a crowd. In the Roman Republic, public meetings weren’t graduate seminars; they were volatile theaters where rivals, hecklers, and opportunists could weaponize a single concrete promise. Precision invites cross-examination. Generalities invite applause.
The specific intent is electoral and defensive: keep commitments elastic, keep coalitions broad, and deny opponents clean targets. A detailed policy proposal has edges, and edges can be sharpened into accusations of elitism, impiety, or betrayal of tradition. By refusing to litigate particulars in public, you control the frame: you become the candidate of “stability,” “virtue,” “the people,” “Rome” - concepts big enough to house contradictory interests without collapsing.
The subtext is colder: mass politics is not a realm of reasoned persuasion so much as impression management. Cicero isn’t praising ignorance; he’s acknowledging incentives. In a crowded forum, the loudest response wins, not the best argument. Policy specificity doesn’t just risk being misunderstood; it risks being remembered, archived, and replayed by enemies.
Context matters: late-Republic Rome was a knife fight conducted with speeches, patronage, and occasional actual knives. Quintus’s advice (in the vein of campaign handbooks attributed to him) treats the electorate as a force to be handled, not enlightened. It’s a bleakly modern lesson: the more public the stage, the safer it is to speak in symbols rather than in plans.
The specific intent is electoral and defensive: keep commitments elastic, keep coalitions broad, and deny opponents clean targets. A detailed policy proposal has edges, and edges can be sharpened into accusations of elitism, impiety, or betrayal of tradition. By refusing to litigate particulars in public, you control the frame: you become the candidate of “stability,” “virtue,” “the people,” “Rome” - concepts big enough to house contradictory interests without collapsing.
The subtext is colder: mass politics is not a realm of reasoned persuasion so much as impression management. Cicero isn’t praising ignorance; he’s acknowledging incentives. In a crowded forum, the loudest response wins, not the best argument. Policy specificity doesn’t just risk being misunderstood; it risks being remembered, archived, and replayed by enemies.
Context matters: late-Republic Rome was a knife fight conducted with speeches, patronage, and occasional actual knives. Quintus’s advice (in the vein of campaign handbooks attributed to him) treats the electorate as a force to be handled, not enlightened. It’s a bleakly modern lesson: the more public the stage, the safer it is to speak in symbols rather than in plans.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Quintus
Add to List





