"Awareness has changed so that every act for children, every piece of legislation recognizes that children are part of families and that it is within families that children grow and thrive or don't"
About this Quote
There is a quiet rebuke hiding in Weissbourd's plainspoken optimism: the era of treating children as isolated policy subjects is over, and it was never realistic to begin with. By saying "awareness has changed", she frames the shift as moral progress rather than partisan fight, a rhetorical move that makes the conclusion feel inevitable. You can disagree with the implications, but it’s hard to argue with the premise: kids don't live in programs, they live in households.
The sentence does a lot of work with its connective tissue. "Every act for children, every piece of legislation" widens the claim to the point of aspiration, not description. It's less a report than a standard she's pressuring institutions to meet: if you're drafting policy and you don't account for family systems, you're doing it wrong. The subtext is an indictment of siloed interventions - school reform that ignores housing instability, nutrition policy that doesn't touch parental work schedules, mental health initiatives that stop at the child and never reach the caregiver.
Then she lands the line that makes it sting: "grow and thrive or don't". That blunt binary cuts through the sentimental language that often surrounds childhood. It also signals a willingness to name failure without melodrama. The family is presented as the primary ecosystem, which carries both compassion and risk: compassion, because it argues for supporting caregivers; risk, because "family" can become a euphemism for privatizing responsibility. Weissbourd is staking a claim about where outcomes are made - and daring lawmakers to follow the consequences of that claim all the way home.
The sentence does a lot of work with its connective tissue. "Every act for children, every piece of legislation" widens the claim to the point of aspiration, not description. It's less a report than a standard she's pressuring institutions to meet: if you're drafting policy and you don't account for family systems, you're doing it wrong. The subtext is an indictment of siloed interventions - school reform that ignores housing instability, nutrition policy that doesn't touch parental work schedules, mental health initiatives that stop at the child and never reach the caregiver.
Then she lands the line that makes it sting: "grow and thrive or don't". That blunt binary cuts through the sentimental language that often surrounds childhood. It also signals a willingness to name failure without melodrama. The family is presented as the primary ecosystem, which carries both compassion and risk: compassion, because it argues for supporting caregivers; risk, because "family" can become a euphemism for privatizing responsibility. Weissbourd is staking a claim about where outcomes are made - and daring lawmakers to follow the consequences of that claim all the way home.
Quote Details
| Topic | Family |
|---|
More Quotes by Bernice
Add to List





