"Back in the 60s, San Francisco artists lived in communes"
About this Quote
“Back in the 60s, San Francisco artists lived in communes” lands less like a history lesson and more like a quick conjuring trick: four words (“Back in the 60s”) do the heavy lifting of nostalgia, myth, and mild scolding all at once. Coming from an actor like Gedde Watanabe, it reads as a line meant to color a scene and signal a vibe: the era when creativity supposedly didn’t need a venture capitalist, just a mattress on the floor and a shared pot of something simmering.
The specific intent is economical world-building. “San Francisco artists” compresses an entire cultural brand - counterculture, experimentation, anti-establishment chic - into a shorthand the audience already recognizes. “Lived in communes” is the punch: not just shared rent, but a social arrangement that implies utopian ambition, porous boundaries, and a willingness to trade privacy for community. It’s a romantic image with grit beneath it.
The subtext, though, is about the present. The line quietly implies that today’s version of “artist in San Francisco” is almost an oxymoron in a city shaped by real estate gravity and tech-fueled stratification. Communes become a proxy for a time when people could afford to be impractical, when art could be central rather than a side hustle.
Context matters: invoking the 1960s San Francisco scene (Haight-Ashbury, antiwar activism, queer liberation, experimental theater) also invites skepticism. Communes weren’t just cozy; they were messy, gendered, and often sustained by invisible labor. That tension is why the line works: it sells a dream while letting the audience feel the cost of losing it.
The specific intent is economical world-building. “San Francisco artists” compresses an entire cultural brand - counterculture, experimentation, anti-establishment chic - into a shorthand the audience already recognizes. “Lived in communes” is the punch: not just shared rent, but a social arrangement that implies utopian ambition, porous boundaries, and a willingness to trade privacy for community. It’s a romantic image with grit beneath it.
The subtext, though, is about the present. The line quietly implies that today’s version of “artist in San Francisco” is almost an oxymoron in a city shaped by real estate gravity and tech-fueled stratification. Communes become a proxy for a time when people could afford to be impractical, when art could be central rather than a side hustle.
Context matters: invoking the 1960s San Francisco scene (Haight-Ashbury, antiwar activism, queer liberation, experimental theater) also invites skepticism. Communes weren’t just cozy; they were messy, gendered, and often sustained by invisible labor. That tension is why the line works: it sells a dream while letting the audience feel the cost of losing it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Gedde
Add to List






