"Balanced budget requirements seem more likely to produce accounting ingenuity than genuinely balanced budgets"
About this Quote
Balanced budget requirements sound like fiscal sobriety, but Sowell is really talking about incentives - and the way politics reliably turns constraints into theater. The line lands because it punctures a comforting civics-class fantasy: that writing a rule into law makes messy human behavior obedient. In Sowell's world, budgets aren’t moral documents; they’re strategic documents. If you demand "balance" on paper, you don’t eliminate deficits so much as you invite officials to rename, reschedule, and reroute them until the numbers look polite.
The phrase "accounting ingenuity" does most of the work. It’s a compliment disguised as an indictment: policymakers can be brilliantly creative, just not in the direction voters are promised. The subtext is classic public choice skepticism - politicians want the spending and the credit for it, but they also want to dodge the political pain of taxes or cuts. A balanced budget mandate becomes a puzzle to solve, not a principle to follow. Shift liabilities off-budget. Borrow through quasi-independent authorities. Push costs into the next fiscal year. Treat rosy assumptions as revenue. "Ingenuity" here is bureaucratic cunning, not innovation.
Context matters: balanced budget amendments and statutory requirements have long been a recurring conservative reform idea in U.S. politics, especially after the inflationary 1970s and during the Reagan-era deficit fights. Sowell’s intent is to warn that technocratic fixes can become self-defeating when they ignore the adaptive behavior of institutions. He’s not arguing against balance as a goal; he’s arguing against mistaking the appearance of discipline for the reality of it.
The phrase "accounting ingenuity" does most of the work. It’s a compliment disguised as an indictment: policymakers can be brilliantly creative, just not in the direction voters are promised. The subtext is classic public choice skepticism - politicians want the spending and the credit for it, but they also want to dodge the political pain of taxes or cuts. A balanced budget mandate becomes a puzzle to solve, not a principle to follow. Shift liabilities off-budget. Borrow through quasi-independent authorities. Push costs into the next fiscal year. Treat rosy assumptions as revenue. "Ingenuity" here is bureaucratic cunning, not innovation.
Context matters: balanced budget amendments and statutory requirements have long been a recurring conservative reform idea in U.S. politics, especially after the inflationary 1970s and during the Reagan-era deficit fights. Sowell’s intent is to warn that technocratic fixes can become self-defeating when they ignore the adaptive behavior of institutions. He’s not arguing against balance as a goal; he’s arguing against mistaking the appearance of discipline for the reality of it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
