"Barge traffic on the Mississippi River represents the most efficient, most cost-effective, most environmentally sound means of transporting commodity goods from this region of the country to market"
About this Quote
Barge traffic on the Mississippi isn’t just infrastructure in Leonard Boswell’s framing; it’s a moral ledger. By stacking “most efficient, most cost-effective, most environmentally sound,” he turns a wonky logistics argument into a triple-crown claim: if you oppose barges, you’re not merely disputing a budget line, you’re resisting common sense, fiscal prudence, and green virtue all at once. The rhetoric is classic politician’s engineering: a string of superlatives that sounds empirical while quietly sidestepping trade-offs.
Boswell’s specific intent is regional advocacy dressed up as national interest. “From this region of the country to market” signals the real audience: Midwestern producers, agribusiness, and the coalition of shippers and ports whose livelihoods depend on the river being maintained, dredged, and lock-and-dam systems funded. In that light, “environmentally sound” reads less like an environmentalist conversion and more like a tactical bridge to skeptical urban or coastal lawmakers who might hear “commodity goods” and think corporate subsidy.
The subtext is a pitch for public investment without saying “appropriation.” Barges become a quiet argument for federal spending on waterways: maintain the river, keep exports competitive, keep rural economies humming. It also frames “commodity goods” as inevitabilities rather than choices, avoiding questions about what we ship, how much, and at what ecological cost beyond carbon-per-ton-mile.
Context matters: in late-20th and early-21st century farm-state politics, “market access” is survival language. Boswell’s line sells the river as the most practical story a politician can tell: prosperity that looks like physics.
Boswell’s specific intent is regional advocacy dressed up as national interest. “From this region of the country to market” signals the real audience: Midwestern producers, agribusiness, and the coalition of shippers and ports whose livelihoods depend on the river being maintained, dredged, and lock-and-dam systems funded. In that light, “environmentally sound” reads less like an environmentalist conversion and more like a tactical bridge to skeptical urban or coastal lawmakers who might hear “commodity goods” and think corporate subsidy.
The subtext is a pitch for public investment without saying “appropriation.” Barges become a quiet argument for federal spending on waterways: maintain the river, keep exports competitive, keep rural economies humming. It also frames “commodity goods” as inevitabilities rather than choices, avoiding questions about what we ship, how much, and at what ecological cost beyond carbon-per-ton-mile.
Context matters: in late-20th and early-21st century farm-state politics, “market access” is survival language. Boswell’s line sells the river as the most practical story a politician can tell: prosperity that looks like physics.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Leonard
Add to List
