"Barking dogs occasionally bite, but laughing men hardly ever shoot"
About this Quote
Fear is loud; violence is usually quiet. Lorenz, a behavioral scientist with a knack for aphorism, flips the folk warning about “barking dogs” into a broader argument about human signaling. The line works because it treats aggression as communication before it’s action: bark, bluster, rant, posture. Those displays can escalate into real harm (“occasionally bite”), but their primary function is often deterrence, not damage. The bite is the exception that proves the rule: most threats want an audience more than a victim.
Then comes the sharper turn: “laughing men hardly ever shoot.” Laughter isn’t just the opposite of menace; it’s a social solvent. It de-pressurizes a room, restores shared reality, and forces a moment of perspective. Someone laughing is still in dialogue with other people; someone preparing to shoot has already exited the conversation. Lorenz is pointing at a psychological boundary: lethal violence tends to require emotional narrowing and dehumanization, while laughter requires recognition - of absurdity, of self, of the other.
The subtext is a warning about how we misread danger. Public anger is easy to spot and easy to sensationalize, which can lead societies to chase the wrong threat. The more chilling risks are the controlled, resolved, socially detached actors who don’t bark at all. In the mid-20th-century shadow of mass violence and authoritarianism, Lorenz’s behavioral lens carries moral weight: watch for the moments when a culture loses its capacity to laugh, because that’s when it’s most capable of pulling the trigger.
Then comes the sharper turn: “laughing men hardly ever shoot.” Laughter isn’t just the opposite of menace; it’s a social solvent. It de-pressurizes a room, restores shared reality, and forces a moment of perspective. Someone laughing is still in dialogue with other people; someone preparing to shoot has already exited the conversation. Lorenz is pointing at a psychological boundary: lethal violence tends to require emotional narrowing and dehumanization, while laughter requires recognition - of absurdity, of self, of the other.
The subtext is a warning about how we misread danger. Public anger is easy to spot and easy to sensationalize, which can lead societies to chase the wrong threat. The more chilling risks are the controlled, resolved, socially detached actors who don’t bark at all. In the mid-20th-century shadow of mass violence and authoritarianism, Lorenz’s behavioral lens carries moral weight: watch for the moments when a culture loses its capacity to laugh, because that’s when it’s most capable of pulling the trigger.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Konrad
Add to List




