"Because all of biology is connected, one can often make a breakthrough with an organism that exaggerates a particular phenomenon, and later explore the generality"
About this Quote
Science doesn’t advance by staring harder at the “average” case. Cech is defending a tactical kind of weirdness: pick the organism that turns a subtle signal into a shout, crack the mechanism there, then walk the result back toward the messy middle of life. It’s an argument for model organisms not as stand-ins for humans, but as amplification devices - nature’s way of running an experiment at higher volume.
The phrasing “all of biology is connected” is doing quiet rhetorical work. It’s a bid for permission: if life shares deep molecular grammar, then learning from yeast, Tetrahymena, or bacteria isn’t a detour from human relevance, it’s a shortcut to it. That connective claim also carries a warning. The second half of the line - “later explore the generality” - acknowledges the trap of overreach. A breakthrough in an “exaggerated” organism can seduce researchers into thinking they’ve found a universal law, when they’ve really found one brilliant edge case. Cech is insisting on a two-step discipline: exploit the exaggeration, then test the boundary conditions.
Context matters here because Cech’s own career embodies the logic. His Nobel-winning work on catalytic RNA emerged from studying a ciliate that made the phenomenon unmistakable. The subtext is a defense of basic research budgets and curiosity-driven choices: let scientists chase the organisms that make problems solvable now, and you’ll earn the right to ask the broader, harder questions later.
The phrasing “all of biology is connected” is doing quiet rhetorical work. It’s a bid for permission: if life shares deep molecular grammar, then learning from yeast, Tetrahymena, or bacteria isn’t a detour from human relevance, it’s a shortcut to it. That connective claim also carries a warning. The second half of the line - “later explore the generality” - acknowledges the trap of overreach. A breakthrough in an “exaggerated” organism can seduce researchers into thinking they’ve found a universal law, when they’ve really found one brilliant edge case. Cech is insisting on a two-step discipline: exploit the exaggeration, then test the boundary conditions.
Context matters here because Cech’s own career embodies the logic. His Nobel-winning work on catalytic RNA emerged from studying a ciliate that made the phenomenon unmistakable. The subtext is a defense of basic research budgets and curiosity-driven choices: let scientists chase the organisms that make problems solvable now, and you’ll earn the right to ask the broader, harder questions later.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List







