"Because it equates tradition with prejudice, the left finds itself increasingly unable to converse with ordinary people in their common language"
About this Quote
Lasch is jabbing at a reflex he thinks has hardened into dogma: the habit of treating “tradition” not as a lived inheritance but as a code word for bigotry. The line works because it’s built like a causal chain that feels inevitable. “Because” does the heavy lifting, suggesting this isn’t a mere disagreement but a predictable consequence of a prior mistake. He isn’t pleading for nostalgia; he’s diagnosing a political communications failure with moral stakes.
The key phrase is “ordinary people,” which in Lasch’s hands is less demographic than rhetorical. It’s a claim about who gets to set the terms of public speech. When elites (his recurring target across academia, media, and professional politics) dismiss traditional attachments as automatically suspect, they don’t just alienate voters; they delegitimize the vernacular ways people justify their lives: family obligation, religious cadence, local pride, inherited norms. “Common language” signals something thicker than vocabulary: shared reference points, a moral grammar, the ability to argue without first translating yourself into the approved idiom.
Context matters. Writing in the late Cold War and into the culture-war churn of the 1980s and early 1990s, Lasch watched liberalism drift from bread-and-butter solidarity toward credentialed moral tutelage. The subtext is warning: a left that leads with suspicion of tradition vacates the terrain of belonging, and someone else - often the right - will rush in to offer recognition, even if it arrives packaged with its own exclusions. Lasch is urging the left to distinguish critique from contempt, or risk becoming fluent only among itself.
The key phrase is “ordinary people,” which in Lasch’s hands is less demographic than rhetorical. It’s a claim about who gets to set the terms of public speech. When elites (his recurring target across academia, media, and professional politics) dismiss traditional attachments as automatically suspect, they don’t just alienate voters; they delegitimize the vernacular ways people justify their lives: family obligation, religious cadence, local pride, inherited norms. “Common language” signals something thicker than vocabulary: shared reference points, a moral grammar, the ability to argue without first translating yourself into the approved idiom.
Context matters. Writing in the late Cold War and into the culture-war churn of the 1980s and early 1990s, Lasch watched liberalism drift from bread-and-butter solidarity toward credentialed moral tutelage. The subtext is warning: a left that leads with suspicion of tradition vacates the terrain of belonging, and someone else - often the right - will rush in to offer recognition, even if it arrives packaged with its own exclusions. Lasch is urging the left to distinguish critique from contempt, or risk becoming fluent only among itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List







