"Because we're sponsored by competing breweries there is always competition. When we were both fighting for ninth or 10th place, nobody really cared except the two companies"
About this Quote
Dixon’s line lands because it treats modern sports rivalry the way it often actually works: not as mythic combat between heroes, but as a brand-managed turf war that only becomes “meaningful” when it’s profitable. The first clause - “Because we’re sponsored by competing breweries” - quietly swaps out the usual origin story of competition (pride, legacy, the jersey) for a corporate one. The athletes or teams don’t even need to hate each other; the sponsors do that work for them.
The deadpan kicker is the deflation: “When we were both fighting for ninth or 10th place, nobody really cared except the two companies.” That’s the whole critique in miniature. Public passion is framed as conditional, a spotlight that follows status and stakes. When the results are middling, the crowd’s investment evaporates. What remains is the corporate rivalry, humming along regardless of performance because it’s tied to market share, not the standings.
The subtext is a little bleak, and funny in its resignation: competitive narratives are often retrofitted after the fact. We like to pretend rivalries are organic, but Dixon points at the machinery underneath - sponsorships manufacturing antagonism, marketing departments keeping the feud alive even when the sport can’t. It’s a sly acknowledgment of how commercial logic can outlast competitive relevance, and how “nobody really cared” isn’t a moral failing so much as an admission about attention in an economy built to monetize it.
The deadpan kicker is the deflation: “When we were both fighting for ninth or 10th place, nobody really cared except the two companies.” That’s the whole critique in miniature. Public passion is framed as conditional, a spotlight that follows status and stakes. When the results are middling, the crowd’s investment evaporates. What remains is the corporate rivalry, humming along regardless of performance because it’s tied to market share, not the standings.
The subtext is a little bleak, and funny in its resignation: competitive narratives are often retrofitted after the fact. We like to pretend rivalries are organic, but Dixon points at the machinery underneath - sponsorships manufacturing antagonism, marketing departments keeping the feud alive even when the sport can’t. It’s a sly acknowledgment of how commercial logic can outlast competitive relevance, and how “nobody really cared” isn’t a moral failing so much as an admission about attention in an economy built to monetize it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|
More Quotes by Larry
Add to List
