"Behavior is determined by its consequences"
About this Quote
A cool, almost bureaucratic sentence that smuggles in a revolution. Skinner’s "Behavior is determined by its consequences" strips away the comforting idea that we act from stable inner traits or noble intentions. It’s not a motivational slogan; it’s a power claim about causality. If consequences shape behavior, then whoever controls consequences controls people - and the mind becomes less a private sanctuary than a record of what has been rewarded, ignored, or punished.
The line works because it’s aggressively plain. No metaphysics, no soul-talk, no appeals to character. Just a tight behavioral ledger: actions that pay off get repeated; actions that don’t, fade. The subtext is a challenge to moral storytelling. We love explanations where someone is "disciplined" or "lazy", "good" or "bad". Skinner shrugs at that vocabulary and asks: what are the payoffs? What gets reinforced? What costs are attached?
Context matters. Mid-century American psychology was fighting over the rightful unit of analysis: the introspective self versus observable behavior. Skinner, building on behaviorism, rejects the idea that you need to peer inside to predict and change actions. That’s why the sentence has an engineering vibe. It pairs neatly with the era’s faith in systems: design the environment, tune the incentives, and behavior will follow.
Read now, it lands as both pragmatic and unsettling. It explains everything from app addiction to workplace "culture" with a blunt clarity - and it warns that freedom can be quietly redesigned by whoever sets the rewards.
The line works because it’s aggressively plain. No metaphysics, no soul-talk, no appeals to character. Just a tight behavioral ledger: actions that pay off get repeated; actions that don’t, fade. The subtext is a challenge to moral storytelling. We love explanations where someone is "disciplined" or "lazy", "good" or "bad". Skinner shrugs at that vocabulary and asks: what are the payoffs? What gets reinforced? What costs are attached?
Context matters. Mid-century American psychology was fighting over the rightful unit of analysis: the introspective self versus observable behavior. Skinner, building on behaviorism, rejects the idea that you need to peer inside to predict and change actions. That’s why the sentence has an engineering vibe. It pairs neatly with the era’s faith in systems: design the environment, tune the incentives, and behavior will follow.
Read now, it lands as both pragmatic and unsettling. It explains everything from app addiction to workplace "culture" with a blunt clarity - and it warns that freedom can be quietly redesigned by whoever sets the rewards.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by F. Skinner
Add to List





