"Bipartisanship is nice, but it cannot be a substitute for action, not having it cannot prevent us from going forward"
About this Quote
Bipartisanship is framed here as pleasant-but-optional, a civic garnish rather than the main course. Pelosi’s phrasing performs a quiet demotion: “nice” is the word you use for décor, not for governing. Then she snaps the hierarchy into place: action comes first, agreement can follow. It’s a line designed to sound reasonable while setting up permission to move without Republican buy-in.
The rhetorical trick is the double negative that follows - “not having it cannot prevent us” - which turns absence into impotence. She’s not merely defending party-line legislating; she’s preemptively disarming the most predictable critique: that pushing ahead is “divisive.” By insisting that the lack of bipartisanship has no veto power, Pelosi redefines legitimacy away from cross-party consensus and toward outcomes. Governing becomes an accountability exercise: what did you deliver, not how many hands you shook.
The subtext is as much about power as principle. Pelosi spent years managing razor-thin House margins, where the romance of bipartisan outreach often collides with the math of votes and the clock of crises. In a polarized era, “bipartisanship” is frequently invoked as a delaying tactic - a way to demand endless negotiation while conditions worsen or momentum dies. This line anticipates that game and refuses to play it.
Contextually, it fits Pelosi’s broader brand: institutionalist on process, hard-nosed on results. She’s signaling to moderates that she tried the polite thing, and to her caucus that failure to secure applause from the other side won’t be treated as failure to govern.
The rhetorical trick is the double negative that follows - “not having it cannot prevent us” - which turns absence into impotence. She’s not merely defending party-line legislating; she’s preemptively disarming the most predictable critique: that pushing ahead is “divisive.” By insisting that the lack of bipartisanship has no veto power, Pelosi redefines legitimacy away from cross-party consensus and toward outcomes. Governing becomes an accountability exercise: what did you deliver, not how many hands you shook.
The subtext is as much about power as principle. Pelosi spent years managing razor-thin House margins, where the romance of bipartisan outreach often collides with the math of votes and the clock of crises. In a polarized era, “bipartisanship” is frequently invoked as a delaying tactic - a way to demand endless negotiation while conditions worsen or momentum dies. This line anticipates that game and refuses to play it.
Contextually, it fits Pelosi’s broader brand: institutionalist on process, hard-nosed on results. She’s signaling to moderates that she tried the polite thing, and to her caucus that failure to secure applause from the other side won’t be treated as failure to govern.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Nancy
Add to List
