"Black women, whose experience is unique, are seldom recognized as a particular social-cultural entity and are seldom thought to be important enough for serious scholarly consideration"
About this Quote
Smith’s line is engineered to puncture a polite liberal fiction: that “women” and “Black people” are already fully accounted for in mainstream culture and scholarship. By insisting that Black women’s experience is “unique,” she’s not chasing special pleading; she’s naming a structural blind spot produced by institutions that sort people into single-issue boxes. In practice, that means racism gets studied as if men are its default subjects, while sexism gets theorized as if white women set the template. Black women fall into the gap, treated as an inconvenient overlap rather than a real analytic center.
The phrase “seldom recognized as a particular social-cultural entity” does quiet but radical work. It reframes identity as something produced by social forces and cultural narratives, not just personal biography. Smith is arguing that invisibility isn’t accidental; it’s manufactured by habits of classification, by who gets cited, funded, archived, taught. The follow-up clause - “seldom thought to be important enough for serious scholarly consideration” - is the sharper blade. She’s calling out the prestige economy of academia: “serious” is code for what gatekeepers deem worthy, and that worthiness has historically tracked proximity to whiteness, maleness, and institutional power.
Context matters: Smith emerges from 1970s Black feminist organizing, when movements that promised liberation often replicated the hierarchies they opposed. The intent here is both diagnostic and strategic. If Black women are rendered conceptually marginal, then any politics built on those concepts will reproduce that marginality. Smith isn’t asking for inclusion as a courtesy; she’s demanding a new framework that treats Black women’s lives as theory-making evidence, not footnotes.
The phrase “seldom recognized as a particular social-cultural entity” does quiet but radical work. It reframes identity as something produced by social forces and cultural narratives, not just personal biography. Smith is arguing that invisibility isn’t accidental; it’s manufactured by habits of classification, by who gets cited, funded, archived, taught. The follow-up clause - “seldom thought to be important enough for serious scholarly consideration” - is the sharper blade. She’s calling out the prestige economy of academia: “serious” is code for what gatekeepers deem worthy, and that worthiness has historically tracked proximity to whiteness, maleness, and institutional power.
Context matters: Smith emerges from 1970s Black feminist organizing, when movements that promised liberation often replicated the hierarchies they opposed. The intent here is both diagnostic and strategic. If Black women are rendered conceptually marginal, then any politics built on those concepts will reproduce that marginality. Smith isn’t asking for inclusion as a courtesy; she’s demanding a new framework that treats Black women’s lives as theory-making evidence, not footnotes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Barbara
Add to List





