"Bluster, sputter, question, cavil; but be sure your argument be intricate enough to confound the court"
About this Quote
The subtext is less “law is corrupt” than “law is theater.” In Wycherley’s world, institutions don’t merely tolerate showmanship; they reward it. Complexity becomes a form of authority. If you can make your case sound technically dense, you can borrow the prestige of expertise while smuggling in weak premises. It’s a satirical manual for what we’d now call weaponized procedure: confuse the standard of judgment, then declare victory when judgment fails.
Context matters. Wycherley wrote in an era where wit was both currency and weapon, and where the public sphere was expanding but not necessarily becoming more honest. The line skewers a system in which rhetorical agility outranks moral seriousness. It also anticipates a modern anxiety: that complexity, in the hands of the unscrupulous, can be less a tool for justice than a fog machine for power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Wycherley, William. (2026, January 17). Bluster, sputter, question, cavil; but be sure your argument be intricate enough to confound the court. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/bluster-sputter-question-cavil-but-be-sure-your-27637/
Chicago Style
Wycherley, William. "Bluster, sputter, question, cavil; but be sure your argument be intricate enough to confound the court." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/bluster-sputter-question-cavil-but-be-sure-your-27637/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Bluster, sputter, question, cavil; but be sure your argument be intricate enough to confound the court." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/bluster-sputter-question-cavil-but-be-sure-your-27637/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.






