"Bob Dylan's first couple of records in the 60's weren't considered cover records, but he only wrote one or two original songs on each album"
About this Quote
Mellencamp is doing something sneakier than a Dylan fact-check. He’s poking at a modern badge of authenticity: the idea that “real” artists write everything, and anyone leaning on existing material is somehow lesser. By reminding you that early Dylan albums were largely built on traditional songs, Mellencamp drags a sacred narrative back down to the workshop level. Folk, he implies, wasn’t a brand of solitary genius; it was a commons, a recycling system, a live-wire conversation where borrowing was the point.
The intent feels defensive in the best way: a working musician insisting that craft and credibility don’t start at the blank page. In the streaming era, where liner notes are invisible and originality gets flattened into “who wrote it,” Mellencamp is arguing for a different metric: selection, interpretation, and arrangement as authorship. Dylan didn’t become Dylan by avoiding other people’s songs; he became Dylan by reframing them until they sounded like prophecy.
There’s subtext, too, about gatekeeping. Dylan is often used as the cudgel in rock discourse: the patron saint of writing, the gold standard that disqualifies everyone else. Mellencamp flips that weapon around. If Dylan’s early canon was part cover, then the purity test is rigged, and the culture’s obsession with the lone songwriter is more myth than history.
Contextually, it’s also a subtle defense of roots music itself, a genre frequently treated as “less original” precisely because it admits its sources. Mellencamp’s point: influence isn’t a stain; it’s the bloodstream.
The intent feels defensive in the best way: a working musician insisting that craft and credibility don’t start at the blank page. In the streaming era, where liner notes are invisible and originality gets flattened into “who wrote it,” Mellencamp is arguing for a different metric: selection, interpretation, and arrangement as authorship. Dylan didn’t become Dylan by avoiding other people’s songs; he became Dylan by reframing them until they sounded like prophecy.
There’s subtext, too, about gatekeeping. Dylan is often used as the cudgel in rock discourse: the patron saint of writing, the gold standard that disqualifies everyone else. Mellencamp flips that weapon around. If Dylan’s early canon was part cover, then the purity test is rigged, and the culture’s obsession with the lone songwriter is more myth than history.
Contextually, it’s also a subtle defense of roots music itself, a genre frequently treated as “less original” precisely because it admits its sources. Mellencamp’s point: influence isn’t a stain; it’s the bloodstream.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List

