"Brigham Young had 47 children, and over 50 women as wives"
About this Quote
The sentence lands like a blunt instrument because it refuses metaphor: it’s pure inventory. That’s the point. By reducing Brigham Young to a headcount of children and wives, Henson strips away the varnish that usually coats prophetic founders and replaces it with logistics. In one line, charisma becomes arithmetic, sanctity becomes scale.
As a scientist, Henson’s implied method is observational: look at outputs, not testimonies. The numbers aren’t just trivia; they function as evidence in an argument about power, incentives, and social engineering. Polygamy here reads less like a quirky historical footnote and more like a reproductive strategy enabled by religious authority. The phrasing quietly invites a modern reader to run the mental simulation: what does a community look like when one apex male accumulates that much sexual and familial access? Who doesn’t get to marry? What does that do to loyalty, dissent, and the distribution of status?
The subtext also pokes at American amnesia. Brigham Young is often packaged as a pioneer-administrator, a builder. Henson’s count disrupts that civic myth by foregrounding a feature that contemporary liberal culture finds hard to domesticate: institutionalized patriarchy with a biological footprint. Even the “over 50” carries a rhetorical edge, suggesting magnitude beyond neat documentation, as if the record itself strains under the practice.
It’s not primarily a moral condemnation; it’s a reframing. The intent is to make the reader see religious history through the colder lens of resource allocation and reproductive economics, where revelation and hierarchy can look uncomfortably similar.
As a scientist, Henson’s implied method is observational: look at outputs, not testimonies. The numbers aren’t just trivia; they function as evidence in an argument about power, incentives, and social engineering. Polygamy here reads less like a quirky historical footnote and more like a reproductive strategy enabled by religious authority. The phrasing quietly invites a modern reader to run the mental simulation: what does a community look like when one apex male accumulates that much sexual and familial access? Who doesn’t get to marry? What does that do to loyalty, dissent, and the distribution of status?
The subtext also pokes at American amnesia. Brigham Young is often packaged as a pioneer-administrator, a builder. Henson’s count disrupts that civic myth by foregrounding a feature that contemporary liberal culture finds hard to domesticate: institutionalized patriarchy with a biological footprint. Even the “over 50” carries a rhetorical edge, suggesting magnitude beyond neat documentation, as if the record itself strains under the practice.
It’s not primarily a moral condemnation; it’s a reframing. The intent is to make the reader see religious history through the colder lens of resource allocation and reproductive economics, where revelation and hierarchy can look uncomfortably similar.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marriage |
|---|
More Quotes by Keith
Add to List
