Politics & Power Quote by Bart Gordon

“Serve the public interest” is the velvet glove here: a phrase so broad it can hold anything from genuine child protection to outright moral policing. Bart Gordon, speaking as a politician and regulator-adjacent lawmaker, leans on the oldest American communications bargain: broadcasters get scarce public airwaves, so they owe the public something in return. That framing isn’t accidental. It turns censorship-sounding enforcement into stewardship, making limits on speech feel like basic infrastructure maintenance.

The line’s real engine is the time-based qualifier: “particularly during the hours when children are likely to be watching.” That’s the safe harbor logic popularized in the post-FCC era of indecency fights and culture-war flare-ups over profanity, sexuality, and “shock” content. You don’t have to ban everything; you just have to corral it into late-night, when the audience is presumed adult. It’s a politically elegant compromise because it borrows the moral clarity of “think of the children” without requiring a universal crackdown that would trigger louder First Amendment alarms.

“Objectionable” does a lot of strategic work too. It’s a mushy word that invites consensus while dodging specifics. Everyone agrees kids shouldn’t be served extreme material at 7 p.m.; fewer people agree on whether a swear word, a queer kiss, or a frank news clip counts. That ambiguity grants regulators discretionary power and gives politicians rhetorical cover: they can champion protection while leaving the boundaries to agencies, complaints, and whichever public panic is loudest that week.

The subtext is less about children than about legitimacy: reassuring anxious voters that someone is minding the cultural gates, even as the media landscape keeps slipping beyond broadcast control.