"Bullets cannot be recalled. They cannot be uninvented. But they can be taken out of the gun"
About this Quote
Amis turns gun violence into a grammar lesson about irreversibility: once a bullet is fired, the sentence is over. The first two lines are brutally final, a pair of clipped negatives that refuse consolation. “Recalled” suggests a product defect, a corporate fix; “uninvented” expands the scope to civilization itself, the fantasy that we can rewind technology. Amis yanks both escape hatches closed, then pivots on “But” to offer a smaller, more human scale of agency. You can’t erase the existence of bullets or the idea of them, but you can interrupt the chain of events that turns possibility into obituary.
The subtext is classic Amis: impatient with sentimental solutions, skeptical of utopian talk, allergic to moral grandstanding. He doesn’t romanticize the gun as a symbol; he treats it as a mechanism. That’s the rhetorical trick. By describing violence as a process with stages, he shifts responsibility away from abstract “evil” and toward decisions, policies, habits, access. It’s a line designed to puncture the fatalism that so often follows mass shootings: the shrug that “nothing can be done” because the tools exist. Amis concedes the permanence of invention precisely to deny the permanence of outcomes.
Contextually, it lands in late-20th/early-21st-century arguments about guns, terrorism, and technological saturation: a world where weaponry is easy to acquire, images of carnage are instantly replayed, and calls for change compete with resigned cynicism. His point is not that prevention is simple; it’s that it’s still imaginable. The gun is the hinge between inevitability and choice.
The subtext is classic Amis: impatient with sentimental solutions, skeptical of utopian talk, allergic to moral grandstanding. He doesn’t romanticize the gun as a symbol; he treats it as a mechanism. That’s the rhetorical trick. By describing violence as a process with stages, he shifts responsibility away from abstract “evil” and toward decisions, policies, habits, access. It’s a line designed to puncture the fatalism that so often follows mass shootings: the shrug that “nothing can be done” because the tools exist. Amis concedes the permanence of invention precisely to deny the permanence of outcomes.
Contextually, it lands in late-20th/early-21st-century arguments about guns, terrorism, and technological saturation: a world where weaponry is easy to acquire, images of carnage are instantly replayed, and calls for change compete with resigned cynicism. His point is not that prevention is simple; it’s that it’s still imaginable. The gun is the hinge between inevitability and choice.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List
