"Bullock by name, and Bullock by nature"
About this Quote
Name-as-destiny is a cheap joke until a historian uses it on himself. "Bullock by name, and Bullock by nature" lands because it’s simultaneously a wink and a warning: a man whose surname already suggests heft, stubbornness, and a certain blunt force, turning the old proverb ("by name and by nature") into self-portraiture. Coming from Alan Bullock - best known for weighty biographies of Hitler and Stalin - the line reads like a private aside from someone routinely accused of being too solid, too institutional, too immovable.
The intent feels defensive and disarming at once. By claiming the stereotype first, Bullock drains it of venom. If critics hear "Bullock" and think "bull-like", he’s already leaned into it: yes, I’m persistent; yes, I take up space; yes, I’m not here to do airy theorizing. That posture fits a mid-century British academic culture that prized gravitas and distrusted flamboyance. It also signals confidence in the historian’s craft: to write about totalitarian power you need patience, archival stamina, and the refusal to be knocked off course by fashion.
The subtext is about authority. Historians are always negotiating how much of themselves belongs in the work. Bullock’s quip acknowledges the personal brand behind "objectivity" - the temperament that shapes what counts as evidence, what feels plausible, what gets emphasized. It’s a joke, but it’s also an admission that scholarship has a spine, and sometimes that spine is just the author’s nature.
The intent feels defensive and disarming at once. By claiming the stereotype first, Bullock drains it of venom. If critics hear "Bullock" and think "bull-like", he’s already leaned into it: yes, I’m persistent; yes, I take up space; yes, I’m not here to do airy theorizing. That posture fits a mid-century British academic culture that prized gravitas and distrusted flamboyance. It also signals confidence in the historian’s craft: to write about totalitarian power you need patience, archival stamina, and the refusal to be knocked off course by fashion.
The subtext is about authority. Historians are always negotiating how much of themselves belongs in the work. Bullock’s quip acknowledges the personal brand behind "objectivity" - the temperament that shapes what counts as evidence, what feels plausible, what gets emphasized. It’s a joke, but it’s also an admission that scholarship has a spine, and sometimes that spine is just the author’s nature.
Quote Details
| Topic | Puns & Wordplay |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alan
Add to List






