"But as a German - and I am German-born - we Germans are condemned once again to be radical revisionists"
About this Quote
There’s a neat bit of rhetorical laundering happening here: Zundel wraps a political project in the language of fate and identity. “As a German” functions as a credential and a shield, implying insider authority while daring critics to treat his argument as an attack on nationality itself. The parenthetical “and I am German-born” is an extra stamp of authenticity, the kind you add when you know the audience may question your standing. It’s less biography than preemptive litigation.
“Condemned once again” is the emotional engine. Condemned by whom? History, victors, public opinion, law? The vagueness is the point. By framing himself and “we Germans” as punished subjects, he flips moral gravity: the group associated with perpetration becomes the group enduring an ongoing sentence. “Once again” suggests a cycle of humiliation, smuggling in resentment as a reasonable response rather than an ideological choice.
The clincher is “radical revisionists.” Revisionism, in neutral contexts, can mean reexamining narratives; Zundel’s career makes the intended register sharper and darker. “Radical” sells transgression as courage. “Revisionists” recasts denial or minimization as intellectual bravery against an orthodox “official story.” It’s a classic extremist move: borrow the posture of the skeptic, claim the romance of the dissident, and call it scholarship.
Context matters because the sentence is engineered for postwar German guilt politics and diaspora grievance. It aims to conscript collective identity into an agenda, turning historical accountability into a provocation that demands “revision” as self-defense.
“Condemned once again” is the emotional engine. Condemned by whom? History, victors, public opinion, law? The vagueness is the point. By framing himself and “we Germans” as punished subjects, he flips moral gravity: the group associated with perpetration becomes the group enduring an ongoing sentence. “Once again” suggests a cycle of humiliation, smuggling in resentment as a reasonable response rather than an ideological choice.
The clincher is “radical revisionists.” Revisionism, in neutral contexts, can mean reexamining narratives; Zundel’s career makes the intended register sharper and darker. “Radical” sells transgression as courage. “Revisionists” recasts denial or minimization as intellectual bravery against an orthodox “official story.” It’s a classic extremist move: borrow the posture of the skeptic, claim the romance of the dissident, and call it scholarship.
Context matters because the sentence is engineered for postwar German guilt politics and diaspora grievance. It aims to conscript collective identity into an agenda, turning historical accountability into a provocation that demands “revision” as self-defense.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Ernst
Add to List






