"But at a certain point, and I don't really know... people have asked me this. I don't know exactly what it was that pushed me towards directing, but I think it was a naive notion that if I directed I would be able to play all the roles. A kind of greed"
About this Quote
Bogdanovich frames ambition the way artists actually experience it: not as a noble calling, but as a slightly embarrassing itch. The charming stutter of qualifiers - "at a certain point", "I don't really know" - isn’t evasive so much as a refusal to retro-fit myth onto a career. In an industry that loves origin stories, he insists on something messier: a drift, a hunch, a hunger you only understand after it’s already rearranged your life.
Then he lands the punchline with disarming bluntness: directing as a "naive notion" of playing "all the roles". It’s a kid’s fantasy, but also an uncannily accurate description of the job. Directors perform through other bodies; they ventriloquize. The line exposes the paradox at the heart of auteur culture: the director is celebrated as the singular genius precisely because their authorship is distributed across actors, cinematographers, editors, producers - a collective achievement repackaged as one signature.
Calling it "a kind of greed" adds bite. Bogdanovich isn’t confessing to villainy; he’s naming a creative possessiveness that sits beneath taste and craft. The impulse to control tone, rhythm, performance, even the audience’s emotional tempo is, at its core, acquisitive. Coming from a New Hollywood figure who moved between critic, historian, and filmmaker, the remark also reads as self-awareness about power: criticism watches, directing takes. His "greed" is the desire to stop observing cinema and start inhabiting it, to own the whole room by orchestrating everyone else’s presence.
Then he lands the punchline with disarming bluntness: directing as a "naive notion" of playing "all the roles". It’s a kid’s fantasy, but also an uncannily accurate description of the job. Directors perform through other bodies; they ventriloquize. The line exposes the paradox at the heart of auteur culture: the director is celebrated as the singular genius precisely because their authorship is distributed across actors, cinematographers, editors, producers - a collective achievement repackaged as one signature.
Calling it "a kind of greed" adds bite. Bogdanovich isn’t confessing to villainy; he’s naming a creative possessiveness that sits beneath taste and craft. The impulse to control tone, rhythm, performance, even the audience’s emotional tempo is, at its core, acquisitive. Coming from a New Hollywood figure who moved between critic, historian, and filmmaker, the remark also reads as self-awareness about power: criticism watches, directing takes. His "greed" is the desire to stop observing cinema and start inhabiting it, to own the whole room by orchestrating everyone else’s presence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List


