"But at the same time, I have trouble keeping things out of books, which is why I don't write short stories because they turn into novels"
About this Quote
Jonathan Coe admits to a writerly excess, not a lack of material but a resistance to fencing it off. The most difficult part of composition is often exclusion, the ruthless shaping that leaves rich digressions on the cutting room floor. He says plainly that he struggles to keep things out, and so brief forms refuse to stay brief; a short story sprouts branches until it becomes a novel.
That impulse matches the work. Coe is a chronicler of modern Britain whose fiction thrives on accumulation: voices, subplots, trivia, history. The Rotters Club moves from factory floors and labor strife to prog rock rehearsals and adolescent longing; What a Carve Up! braids media, agribusiness, art, and politics into a single indictment. Middle England revisits characters from earlier books to track decades of social change. Even at the sentence level, expansiveness becomes a principle: he once stretched a sentence across dozens of pages to capture the unbroken rush of consciousness. The novel, with its capacious baggy frame, becomes the natural vessel for this appetite.
Set against the short story tradition of compression and a single effect, as Poe advocated, Coe’s method looks deliberately unruly. It is also a stance. He wrote a biography of B. S. Johnson, a champion of radical pruning and formal severity; Coe’s fiction answers with hospitality rather than austerity, letting the messy interconnections of public life and private feeling mingle on the page. The choice of form is therefore ethical as much as aesthetic. To carve away is to simplify; to include is to honor the stubborn excess of reality.
The line reads as self-knowledge and as poetics. Some temperaments thrive on distillation; his thrives on sprawl. The novel, in his hands, is not just a story but a social panorama, the only format roomy enough to keep letting things in without apology.
That impulse matches the work. Coe is a chronicler of modern Britain whose fiction thrives on accumulation: voices, subplots, trivia, history. The Rotters Club moves from factory floors and labor strife to prog rock rehearsals and adolescent longing; What a Carve Up! braids media, agribusiness, art, and politics into a single indictment. Middle England revisits characters from earlier books to track decades of social change. Even at the sentence level, expansiveness becomes a principle: he once stretched a sentence across dozens of pages to capture the unbroken rush of consciousness. The novel, with its capacious baggy frame, becomes the natural vessel for this appetite.
Set against the short story tradition of compression and a single effect, as Poe advocated, Coe’s method looks deliberately unruly. It is also a stance. He wrote a biography of B. S. Johnson, a champion of radical pruning and formal severity; Coe’s fiction answers with hospitality rather than austerity, letting the messy interconnections of public life and private feeling mingle on the page. The choice of form is therefore ethical as much as aesthetic. To carve away is to simplify; to include is to honor the stubborn excess of reality.
The line reads as self-knowledge and as poetics. Some temperaments thrive on distillation; his thrives on sprawl. The novel, in his hands, is not just a story but a social panorama, the only format roomy enough to keep letting things in without apology.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List

