"But at the time when he wrote, Englishmen, with the rarest exceptions, wrote only in French or Latin; and when they began to write in English, a man of genius, to interpret and improve on him, was not found for a long time"
About this Quote
Genius, Saintsbury suggests, is not just an individual spark but a linguistic and institutional accident. He’s looking back at a moment when English wasn’t yet the natural medium for serious thought: educated Englishmen performed intellect in French or Latin because those languages carried prestige, portability, and authority. English existed, but it wasn’t the language you used to be taken seriously by courts, universities, or Europe.
The sentence quietly mourns what that hierarchy costs. Writing “only in French or Latin” isn’t framed as cosmopolitan fluency; it’s a cultural choke point. Talent can appear, but without a legitimated vernacular ecosystem, it can’t compound. Saintsbury’s key move is the second clause: when English finally does emerge as a literary vehicle, the problem becomes not just making texts, but making readers and successors. A “man of genius” is needed “to interpret and improve on him” - an admission that canon formation is collaborative, iterative, and delayed by social infrastructure. Great work can arrive too early for the audience capable of metabolizing it.
Saintsbury, a Victorian-era critic steeped in literary history, is also defending the slow construction of an English tradition: the nation’s literature doesn’t spring fully formed; it has to be authorized against imported standards. The subtext is faintly nationalistic, but also pragmatic: language status determines who gets remembered, who gets refined, and how long brilliance has to wait before it becomes culture rather than curiosity.
The sentence quietly mourns what that hierarchy costs. Writing “only in French or Latin” isn’t framed as cosmopolitan fluency; it’s a cultural choke point. Talent can appear, but without a legitimated vernacular ecosystem, it can’t compound. Saintsbury’s key move is the second clause: when English finally does emerge as a literary vehicle, the problem becomes not just making texts, but making readers and successors. A “man of genius” is needed “to interpret and improve on him” - an admission that canon formation is collaborative, iterative, and delayed by social infrastructure. Great work can arrive too early for the audience capable of metabolizing it.
Saintsbury, a Victorian-era critic steeped in literary history, is also defending the slow construction of an English tradition: the nation’s literature doesn’t spring fully formed; it has to be authorized against imported standards. The subtext is faintly nationalistic, but also pragmatic: language status determines who gets remembered, who gets refined, and how long brilliance has to wait before it becomes culture rather than curiosity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List
