"But every time our ability to access information and to communicate it to others is improved, in some sense we have achieved an increase over natural intelligence"
About this Quote
Vinge’s move here is to quietly demote “intelligence” from a trait you possess to an effect you can rent. The sentence sounds like a calm observation, but it’s a Trojan horse: if intelligence can be “increased” by better access and better communication, then the boundary between human minds and the systems around them is already porous. We’re not waiting for a godlike AI to arrive; we’ve been stapling prosthetics onto cognition for decades.
The phrase “in some sense” is doing a lot of work. It’s a hedge, but also a lawyerly permission slip to count Google, libraries, peer review, translation, and networks as intelligence-adjacent. Vinge isn’t claiming your brain cells multiply when broadband speeds up. He’s arguing that what matters is capability: solving problems, coordinating action, compressing complexity into shareable chunks. That’s an operational definition of intelligence, tuned to a technologist’s worldview.
The subtext is classic Vinge-era singularity thinking: the “natural” mind is less an apex than a baseline platform. Each improvement in the information stack (storage, search, bandwidth, interfaces, social protocols) shifts the effective IQ of a civilization, even if no individual gets smarter. It also reframes fear. If “increases over natural intelligence” can be incremental and infrastructural, then the future won’t necessarily announce itself with a sentient machine. It will show up as a widening gap between those plugged into the cognitive exoskeleton and those left to think alone.
The phrase “in some sense” is doing a lot of work. It’s a hedge, but also a lawyerly permission slip to count Google, libraries, peer review, translation, and networks as intelligence-adjacent. Vinge isn’t claiming your brain cells multiply when broadband speeds up. He’s arguing that what matters is capability: solving problems, coordinating action, compressing complexity into shareable chunks. That’s an operational definition of intelligence, tuned to a technologist’s worldview.
The subtext is classic Vinge-era singularity thinking: the “natural” mind is less an apex than a baseline platform. Each improvement in the information stack (storage, search, bandwidth, interfaces, social protocols) shifts the effective IQ of a civilization, even if no individual gets smarter. It also reframes fear. If “increases over natural intelligence” can be incremental and infrastructural, then the future won’t necessarily announce itself with a sentient machine. It will show up as a widening gap between those plugged into the cognitive exoskeleton and those left to think alone.
Quote Details
| Topic | Artificial Intelligence |
|---|
More Quotes by Vernor
Add to List





