"But he knew people and he was head writer for Have Gun Will Travel, and if you took those early Star Treks that we did and put us in a western wardrobe and put us on wagon train going west, we can say the same lines"
About this Quote
Majel Barrett is doing that wonderfully deflating Hollywood thing: praising Star Trek by stripping it of its sacred props. Take away the phasers, the nacelles, the utopian sheen, she argues, and you still have a wagon train headed into the unknown, trading quips and moral dilemmas the way a western trades gunfights and dust. It is both a compliment and a quiet correction to fandom mythology. Trek wasn’t beamed down from pure futurist inspiration; it was built by working TV people who understood what reliably plays.
Her reference point, Have Gun - Will Travel, matters. That show was a classy, literate western with a hired-gun protagonist who solved problems as much with ethics and dialogue as with violence. By invoking its head writer, Barrett is pointing to the real engine of early Trek: character-driven scripts that smuggled big ideas through a familiar delivery system. The “we can say the same lines” claim isn’t literal so much as structural. It suggests the dialogue is modular because the situations are archetypal: strangers, borders, law versus conscience, the price of progress. Swap uniforms, keep the tensions.
There’s also a subtle insider’s jab at the fetish for genre trappings. Fans remember the Enterprise; Barrett remembers the writers room and the pragmatic alchemy of television: sell the new by disguising it as the known. In her telling, Star Trek’s cultural staying power isn’t just its futurism. It’s its ability to smuggle a western’s sturdy storytelling into a spaceship and call it a frontier.
Her reference point, Have Gun - Will Travel, matters. That show was a classy, literate western with a hired-gun protagonist who solved problems as much with ethics and dialogue as with violence. By invoking its head writer, Barrett is pointing to the real engine of early Trek: character-driven scripts that smuggled big ideas through a familiar delivery system. The “we can say the same lines” claim isn’t literal so much as structural. It suggests the dialogue is modular because the situations are archetypal: strangers, borders, law versus conscience, the price of progress. Swap uniforms, keep the tensions.
There’s also a subtle insider’s jab at the fetish for genre trappings. Fans remember the Enterprise; Barrett remembers the writers room and the pragmatic alchemy of television: sell the new by disguising it as the known. In her telling, Star Trek’s cultural staying power isn’t just its futurism. It’s its ability to smuggle a western’s sturdy storytelling into a spaceship and call it a frontier.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Majel
Add to List



