"But I can tell that once, and if, and when this issue gets to be, under real terms, investigated, you will be seeing certain people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally"

Sibel Edmonds' quote suggests a future situation where a considerable concern-- most likely involving legal or ethical misbehavior-- undergoes comprehensive examination. Edmonds indicates that if such an investigation were to occur genuinely and comprehensively, it would expose the guilt of certain people. These are people identifiable within the context of the speaker's referral to "this nation", suggesting they are most likely prominent figures or public authorities in the United States.

The expression "under real terms" shows hesitation about whether such an examination will occur, implying prospective obstruction or absence of earnestness in previous queries. Edmonds highlights the gravity of the scenario by forecasting that those linked will face legal repercussions, emphasizing the severity by utilizing terms like "standing trial" and "prosecuted criminally". This recommends that the actions in concern are not just unethical but likewise unlawful, calling for official judicial procedures.

The impact of Edmonds' statement lies in its insinuation of corruption or misbehavior at potentially high levels of authority. It raises concerns about responsibility, transparency, and the willingness or capability of the justice system to deal with such matters without bias or impact.

Edmonds' statement can be seen as a call to action, motivating closer public examination and demanding rigorous investigative procedures. It indicates that the repercussions of not resolving these problems could perpetuate systemic problems. Additionally, it serves as a warning to those in power that unattended actions may eventually lead to legal effects.

In more comprehensive terms, the quote shows a typical concern about how power dynamics can protect individuals from responsibility and the function of the judicial system in securing justice. This highlights the tension in between public interest and institutional integrity, motivating alertness and requiring reforms to guarantee that reality and justice are not compromised by political or social influences.