"But I can tell you that the issue, on one side, boils down to money - a lot of money. And it boils down to people and their connections with this money, and that's the portion that, even with this book, has not been mentioned to this day"
About this Quote
Money is the least poetic motive, which is exactly why Edmonds leans on it. Her line isn’t trying to be eloquent; it’s trying to be irreversible. By insisting the issue “boils down to money - a lot of money,” she strips away the comforting story consumers of politics prefer: that fights are about values, ideology, or even incompetence. She’s telling you to stop looking for villains with speeches and start looking for beneficiaries with ledgers.
The phrasing does two things at once. First, it simplifies: “on one side” suggests a conflict with multiple narratives, but she’s identifying the one that actually pays. Second, it implicates without naming: “people and their connections with this money” is careful language from someone who knows how power retaliates. It flags a network (not a lone bad actor) and hints at why accountability stalls: connections are harder to prosecute than acts, especially when they run through donors, contractors, intermediaries, and the revolving door between government and industry.
The most loaded clause is the last one: “even with this book, has not been mentioned to this day.” That’s a whistleblower’s paradox in miniature. She’s publishing, yet still signaling omission, censorship, legal constraint, or institutional pressure. The subtext is less “I have secrets” than “the system is designed so the full story can’t be safely printed.” Coming from a public servant, the intent reads like a warning from inside the machinery: follow the money, and you’ll understand both the scandal and the silence around it.
The phrasing does two things at once. First, it simplifies: “on one side” suggests a conflict with multiple narratives, but she’s identifying the one that actually pays. Second, it implicates without naming: “people and their connections with this money” is careful language from someone who knows how power retaliates. It flags a network (not a lone bad actor) and hints at why accountability stalls: connections are harder to prosecute than acts, especially when they run through donors, contractors, intermediaries, and the revolving door between government and industry.
The most loaded clause is the last one: “even with this book, has not been mentioned to this day.” That’s a whistleblower’s paradox in miniature. She’s publishing, yet still signaling omission, censorship, legal constraint, or institutional pressure. The subtext is less “I have secrets” than “the system is designed so the full story can’t be safely printed.” Coming from a public servant, the intent reads like a warning from inside the machinery: follow the money, and you’ll understand both the scandal and the silence around it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Sibel
Add to List
