"But I found out that bones with flesh are more interesting than bones without"
About this Quote
The line also smuggles in an argument about storytelling itself. A plot can be perfectly engineered and still feel dead on arrival; a character can have impeccable motivation and still leave no residue. “Flesh” is what makes a role feel inhabited rather than executed - the tiny choices that aren’t strictly necessary but make it human: a pause that suggests reluctance, a laugh that arrives too late, anger that masks tenderness. He’s pointing to the paradox that realism isn’t about accuracy; it’s about specificity.
Coming from an actor, the quote has a professional bite. It’s a rebuke to the cult of “craft” when craft becomes a shield against vulnerability. Bones without flesh are safe: they can’t embarrass you, can’t expose you. Flesh demands contact - with your own emotional material and with the audience’s. MacArthur’s insight is less poetic than pragmatic: if you want to hold attention, you don’t present a specimen. You present a living thing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Life |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
MacArthur, James. (2026, January 17). But I found out that bones with flesh are more interesting than bones without. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/but-i-found-out-that-bones-with-flesh-are-more-65157/
Chicago Style
MacArthur, James. "But I found out that bones with flesh are more interesting than bones without." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/but-i-found-out-that-bones-with-flesh-are-more-65157/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"But I found out that bones with flesh are more interesting than bones without." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/but-i-found-out-that-bones-with-flesh-are-more-65157/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.










