"But I think, and hope, that the novels can be understood and enjoyed as science fiction, on their own terms"
About this Quote
There’s a quiet act of self-defense in Simmons’s phrasing: he’s asking to be read without a bailiff in the room. “Understood and enjoyed” pairs legitimacy with pleasure, a two-front argument against the way genre fiction is often treated as either disposable entertainment or a guilty pleasure that needs a “serious” alibi. By foregrounding “science fiction” and insisting on “their own terms,” he’s drawing a boundary line against critics who approach SF like tourists at a theme park: amused, superior, and ready to translate everything into respectable literary categories before they’ll grant it value.
The intent is modest on the surface and strategic underneath. Simmons isn’t claiming his novels transcend genre; he’s claiming genre can contain ambition, complexity, and emotional weight without being smuggled into the mainstream under a fake passport. The word “can” matters: it acknowledges an audience trained to believe SF requires decoding (or apologizing for), while still holding out hope that readers might meet the work where it lives - in speculation, scale, and the pleasures of invented worlds.
Contextually, Simmons writes in a moment when science fiction is commercially dominant yet still culturally policed. Prestigious review culture has long rewarded SF when it behaves “literary” and punished it when it behaves like itself. His line pushes back against that bargain. It’s a request for fair play: judge the book by the rules of its chosen game, not by the standards of a different court.
The intent is modest on the surface and strategic underneath. Simmons isn’t claiming his novels transcend genre; he’s claiming genre can contain ambition, complexity, and emotional weight without being smuggled into the mainstream under a fake passport. The word “can” matters: it acknowledges an audience trained to believe SF requires decoding (or apologizing for), while still holding out hope that readers might meet the work where it lives - in speculation, scale, and the pleasures of invented worlds.
Contextually, Simmons writes in a moment when science fiction is commercially dominant yet still culturally policed. Prestigious review culture has long rewarded SF when it behaves “literary” and punished it when it behaves like itself. His line pushes back against that bargain. It’s a request for fair play: judge the book by the rules of its chosen game, not by the standards of a different court.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Dan
Add to List



