"But I think I can sincerely declare that I cheerfully submit myself to every odious name for conscience' sake; and from my soul I despise all those whose guilt, malice, or folly has made them my foes"
About this Quote
There is a swaggering humility in Otis claiming he will "cheerfully submit" to "every odious name" hurled at him. He’s not performing meekness; he’s weaponizing it. The line turns insult into proof of integrity: if your enemies have to name-call, your conscience has already won the argument. For a colonial lawyer in the 1760s and 1770s, that posture mattered. Otis rose to fame attacking British policies and writs of assistance, then lived inside the predictable backlash: accusations of sedition, ingratitude, demagoguery. He answers by recasting reputation as a moral courtroom where conscience, not public approval, is the judge.
The subtext is also a boundary-setting maneuver. "For conscience' sake" borrows the cadence of religious dissent, tapping a Protestant tradition where obedience to inner conviction outranks obedience to authority. It’s a clever moral escalation: disagreeing with Otis isn’t just politically wrong, it risks being spiritually compromised.
Then he pivots to the harsher move: "from my soul I despise". That isn’t the serene tolerance we associate with civic virtue; it’s a declaration that some opponents have forfeited respect because their hostility is rooted in "guilt, malice, or folly". Otis narrows the legitimate field of debate. In revolutionary discourse, that’s strategic. If your foes aren’t principled adversaries but morally defective actors, you don’t negotiate with them; you outlast them, and you rally others by making contempt feel like a duty.
The subtext is also a boundary-setting maneuver. "For conscience' sake" borrows the cadence of religious dissent, tapping a Protestant tradition where obedience to inner conviction outranks obedience to authority. It’s a clever moral escalation: disagreeing with Otis isn’t just politically wrong, it risks being spiritually compromised.
Then he pivots to the harsher move: "from my soul I despise". That isn’t the serene tolerance we associate with civic virtue; it’s a declaration that some opponents have forfeited respect because their hostility is rooted in "guilt, malice, or folly". Otis narrows the legitimate field of debate. In revolutionary discourse, that’s strategic. If your foes aren’t principled adversaries but morally defective actors, you don’t negotiate with them; you outlast them, and you rally others by making contempt feel like a duty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List








