"But I want to just caution, it is not incumbent on the United States to prove that Saddam Hussein is trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction. He's already demonstrated that he's trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction"
About this Quote
The sentence is built like a legal trick: it tries to win the case by declaring the burden of proof irrelevant. Rice’s “just caution” is a velvet-glove opener, the kind of bureaucratic understatement that signals discipline while smuggling in urgency. Then comes the pivot: “it is not incumbent on the United States to prove...” Not incumbent is doing a lot of work. It reframes evidence-gathering as optional, even faintly naive, at the exact moment when proof is what the public expects before war.
The subtext is strategic impatience. In 2002-03, the Bush administration needed to convert ambiguity into action, to make uncertainty feel irresponsible. Rice’s formulation suggests that asking for verification isn’t prudence; it’s denial in the face of a known pattern. “He’s already demonstrated” functions as a rhetorical receipt that never has to be shown. Demonstrated when? To whom? The line relies on the audience’s hazy memory of Iraq’s earlier chemical weapons use and defiance in the 1990s, collapsing distinct eras into one continuous menace.
It also narrows the moral playing field. If Saddam is already “trying,” then the debate shifts from whether the claim is true to whether America has the will to respond. That’s the intent: move the conversation from facts to resolve. In hindsight, the argument is haunted by what it sidesteps: the difference between capability and intent, between past programs and present stockpiles. Its power comes from sounding like common sense while quietly rewriting the rules of justification.
The subtext is strategic impatience. In 2002-03, the Bush administration needed to convert ambiguity into action, to make uncertainty feel irresponsible. Rice’s formulation suggests that asking for verification isn’t prudence; it’s denial in the face of a known pattern. “He’s already demonstrated” functions as a rhetorical receipt that never has to be shown. Demonstrated when? To whom? The line relies on the audience’s hazy memory of Iraq’s earlier chemical weapons use and defiance in the 1990s, collapsing distinct eras into one continuous menace.
It also narrows the moral playing field. If Saddam is already “trying,” then the debate shifts from whether the claim is true to whether America has the will to respond. That’s the intent: move the conversation from facts to resolve. In hindsight, the argument is haunted by what it sidesteps: the difference between capability and intent, between past programs and present stockpiles. Its power comes from sounding like common sense while quietly rewriting the rules of justification.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Condoleezza
Add to List




