"But I've been very clear in this campaign - I don't believe the party should have a position on abortion"
About this Quote
A politician doesn’t “not have a position” on abortion; he has a positioning strategy. Stephen Harper’s line is a masterclass in tactical restraint, built to sound principled while keeping the explosive details offstage. The key phrase is “very clear,” a pre-emptive claim to transparency that actually performs the opposite: it shuts down follow-up by implying the debate has already been settled. Clarity becomes a shield.
The pivot from “I” to “the party” is the real maneuver. Harper frames the issue as an institutional question of party policy rather than a moral or legislative question of governance. That matters in a Canadian context where abortion is less about a single landmark statute than about the political volatility of reopening the file. By insisting the party shouldn’t take a position, he signals moderation to swing voters and urban centrists, while leaving enough interpretive room for socially conservative supporters to believe the door isn’t locked, just politely closed for now.
Subtextually, it’s a coalition-management statement. Leaders of broad conservative parties often have to keep two audiences in the same room: those who want the issue sidelined and those who want it re-litigated. “Should” does heavy lifting here. It’s not “will not,” not “cannot,” but a soft normative claim that suggests discretion rather than prohibition.
The intent is to depoliticize without disowning. It’s an attempt to turn abortion from a defining wedge into an administrative non-topic, while still keeping leadership authority intact: if the party has no position, the leader controls when and how the conversation returns.
The pivot from “I” to “the party” is the real maneuver. Harper frames the issue as an institutional question of party policy rather than a moral or legislative question of governance. That matters in a Canadian context where abortion is less about a single landmark statute than about the political volatility of reopening the file. By insisting the party shouldn’t take a position, he signals moderation to swing voters and urban centrists, while leaving enough interpretive room for socially conservative supporters to believe the door isn’t locked, just politely closed for now.
Subtextually, it’s a coalition-management statement. Leaders of broad conservative parties often have to keep two audiences in the same room: those who want the issue sidelined and those who want it re-litigated. “Should” does heavy lifting here. It’s not “will not,” not “cannot,” but a soft normative claim that suggests discretion rather than prohibition.
The intent is to depoliticize without disowning. It’s an attempt to turn abortion from a defining wedge into an administrative non-topic, while still keeping leadership authority intact: if the party has no position, the leader controls when and how the conversation returns.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List

