"But just as haste and restlessness are typical of our present-day life, so change also takes place more rapidly than before. This applies to change in the relationships between nations as it does to change within an individual nation"
About this Quote
Stresemann is diagnosing modernity as a political weather system: speed, agitation, and constant motion. The line reads calm, even procedural, but its power lies in how it normalizes volatility. By describing haste and restlessness as "typical", he’s not merely lamenting social churn; he’s telling leaders to stop governing as if time still moves at 19th-century pace.
The intent is pragmatic persuasion. Stresemann, a Weimar-era statesman and architect of Germany’s postwar reintegration, frames rapid change as structural rather than accidental. That matters in 1920s Europe, where borders, currencies, alliances, and regimes had been violently rearranged within a decade. If change is accelerating, then policy can’t be static, morality can’t be smug, and diplomacy can’t be sentimental. His syntax quietly makes an argument for flexibility: what’s true inside a nation (class conflict, political extremism, economic instability) is also true between nations (treaties, security dilemmas, shifting great-power priorities). Domestic and foreign policy become mirrors.
The subtext is a warning against both nostalgia and rigid nationalism. Stresemann is speaking to audiences tempted by absolutes - revanchists demanding immediate reversal of Versailles, idealists expecting permanent settlement, and publics exhausted by crisis. He offers a cooler proposition: instability is the new baseline, so statesmanship is the craft of adaptation, timing, and incremental trust-building. The rhetoric avoids heroics; it’s managerial on purpose, suited to an age where the biggest threat isn’t a single enemy but the velocity of events outrunning institutions.
The intent is pragmatic persuasion. Stresemann, a Weimar-era statesman and architect of Germany’s postwar reintegration, frames rapid change as structural rather than accidental. That matters in 1920s Europe, where borders, currencies, alliances, and regimes had been violently rearranged within a decade. If change is accelerating, then policy can’t be static, morality can’t be smug, and diplomacy can’t be sentimental. His syntax quietly makes an argument for flexibility: what’s true inside a nation (class conflict, political extremism, economic instability) is also true between nations (treaties, security dilemmas, shifting great-power priorities). Domestic and foreign policy become mirrors.
The subtext is a warning against both nostalgia and rigid nationalism. Stresemann is speaking to audiences tempted by absolutes - revanchists demanding immediate reversal of Versailles, idealists expecting permanent settlement, and publics exhausted by crisis. He offers a cooler proposition: instability is the new baseline, so statesmanship is the craft of adaptation, timing, and incremental trust-building. The rhetoric avoids heroics; it’s managerial on purpose, suited to an age where the biggest threat isn’t a single enemy but the velocity of events outrunning institutions.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gustav
Add to List






