"But make no mistake, the President will find in our new majority the voice of the American people as they've expressed it tonight: standing on principle, checking Washington's power and leading the drive for a smaller, less costly, and more accountable government"
About this Quote
Make no mistake is Boehner’s tell: a warning disguised as reassurance. Spoken in the flush of a newly won House majority, the line is less a policy blueprint than a claim of ownership over legitimacy. He isn’t simply announcing partisan control; he’s rebranding it as a constitutional duty. “The voice of the American people” does the heavy lifting, laundering a midterm swing into a sweeping mandate and turning opposition into representation. If you disagree, the implication runs, you’re not arguing with Republicans; you’re arguing with America.
The phrasing is calibrated for a moment defined by Tea Party energy and post-bailout anger at institutions. “Standing on principle” flatters the base as moral, not merely ideological. “Checking Washington’s power” frames confrontation as restraint, even though it also telegraphs obstruction as a governing strategy. The President is named, but “Washington” is the real villain: a convenient abstraction that lets lawmakers run against the very capital they’re about to manage.
Then comes the triad that made 2010’s austerity politics feel like common sense: “smaller, less costly, and more accountable.” It’s a rhythmic sales pitch, each adjective smuggling in assumptions. Smaller implies bloated; less costly implies waste; accountable implies corruption or incompetence. Missing are the trade-offs: what gets cut, who pays, and what “accountable” looks like when oversight becomes spectacle.
The intent is clear: set terms for the next two years as a referendum on executive power, not legislative responsibility. Boehner is telling the President, and the public, that gridlock can be framed as virtue.
The phrasing is calibrated for a moment defined by Tea Party energy and post-bailout anger at institutions. “Standing on principle” flatters the base as moral, not merely ideological. “Checking Washington’s power” frames confrontation as restraint, even though it also telegraphs obstruction as a governing strategy. The President is named, but “Washington” is the real villain: a convenient abstraction that lets lawmakers run against the very capital they’re about to manage.
Then comes the triad that made 2010’s austerity politics feel like common sense: “smaller, less costly, and more accountable.” It’s a rhythmic sales pitch, each adjective smuggling in assumptions. Smaller implies bloated; less costly implies waste; accountable implies corruption or incompetence. Missing are the trade-offs: what gets cut, who pays, and what “accountable” looks like when oversight becomes spectacle.
The intent is clear: set terms for the next two years as a referendum on executive power, not legislative responsibility. Boehner is telling the President, and the public, that gridlock can be framed as virtue.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List




