"But nothing in India is identifiable, the mere asking of a question causes it to disappear or to merge in something else"
About this Quote
Forster’s line doesn’t flatter India as “mysterious”; it needles the very Western habit of turning a place into a set of stable, graspable facts. “Nothing...is identifiable” is an epistemological jab: the moment you try to pin India down with a neat label, the label becomes the real subject, and the thing itself slips away. The sentence stages that failure in real time. “The mere asking of a question” makes the object “disappear” or “merge,” as if inquiry is not a neutral tool but a solvent. Forster turns curiosity into an act with consequences.
The subtext is colonial. In A Passage to India, British officials and visitors arrive armed with categories - race, class, religion, “native character” - expecting India to behave like an administrative file. Forster suggests the opposite: the country is not a puzzle waiting to be solved but a field of competing meanings, where any single explanation collapses under the pressure of the next. “Merge in something else” captures the lived experience of plurality: identities, loyalties, even events refuse to stay singular; they blur into other stories depending on who speaks, who listens, and who holds power.
What makes the line work is its sly reversal. The disappearing act is not India’s trick; it’s the questioner’s. Forster implies that the interrogator brings a demand for definiteness that reality won’t satisfy. The result is less “India is unknowable” than “your way of knowing is inadequate,” a critique aimed at empire’s confidence that understanding is just a matter of better surveys, cleaner maps, sharper questions.
The subtext is colonial. In A Passage to India, British officials and visitors arrive armed with categories - race, class, religion, “native character” - expecting India to behave like an administrative file. Forster suggests the opposite: the country is not a puzzle waiting to be solved but a field of competing meanings, where any single explanation collapses under the pressure of the next. “Merge in something else” captures the lived experience of plurality: identities, loyalties, even events refuse to stay singular; they blur into other stories depending on who speaks, who listens, and who holds power.
What makes the line work is its sly reversal. The disappearing act is not India’s trick; it’s the questioner’s. Forster implies that the interrogator brings a demand for definiteness that reality won’t satisfy. The result is less “India is unknowable” than “your way of knowing is inadequate,” a critique aimed at empire’s confidence that understanding is just a matter of better surveys, cleaner maps, sharper questions.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by M. Forster
Add to List
